Anti-obesity drugs: effective, but not affordable. This may soon change
Over one billion people worldwide live with obesity, with a particularly rapid increase in low- and middle-income countries
Key points
This week's Lancet cover story tackles the thorny topic of "how to make the treatment of obesity fairer", in a wide-ranging reflection on how the anti-obesity drug landscape is changing. Between semaglutide's patent expiry, the arrival of oral options and very low-cost biosimilars, 2026 will be a crucial year for the anti-obesity drug market and, consequently, for clinical practice. And amidst costs that are still prohibitive for many, limited production capacity by pharma companies and constraints in the supply chain (and cold storage for injectables), that billion obesity sufferers worldwide are watching this story unfold with great attention. Because the current challenge is no longer to prove that incretin-based drugs (GLP-1 receptor analogues such as semaglutide, dual agonists such as tirzepatide and future triple agonists such as retatrutide) work. But ensure that they actually reach everyone who needs them.
The year 2026 could go down in history as the watershed in the fight against obesity. After a decade of exponential growth, drugs based on GLP-1 receptor agonists are radically transforming clinical weight management, with the market set to be worth $150 billion by 2035. But of course, this story cannot only be read from the business angle. More than a billion people worldwide live with obesity, with a particularly rapid increase in low- and middle-income countries. But precisely where the need is greatest, access to treatment remains limited by high costs, insufficient manufacturing capacity and fragile supply chains. An imbalance that, according to experts, could, however, begin to diminish in the coming months.
Expiring patents and 'moment' biosimilars
Starting in April, the patents of semaglutide, the blockbuster drug (Ozempic®, Wegovy®) that inaugurated this innovative chapter in obesity therapy (before 'sema', liragluglutide, also from the Danish Novo Nordisk, had tried, but with modest results) will begin to expire in several large emerging markets - including Brazil, Canada, China, India and Turkey - which, taken together, account for around 40% of the world's population. And the effect could be disruptive.
A number of Chinese and Indian pharma companies are preparing to launch biosimilar versions of 'sema' on a large scale, triggering competition similar to that which affected anti-retroviral HIV drugs in the early 2000s. According to preliminary estimates (published as a pre-print in MedRxiv), an injectable biosimilar version could cost as little as $28 per person-year. And by the end of 2026, these therapies could be on the market in 160 countries, accounting for 84% of the anti-obesity drug market. A truly game-changing prospect, which for health systems and investors would represent a real revolution, although not without risk.
The WHO Obesity Guidelines
Responding to such a large number of people with obesity is not just a matter of lowering drug prices. The World Health Organisation has already placed GLP-1 agonists on the list of essential drugs and issued 'global' guidelines for their use. However, at the same time sending a very clear message: systemic tools are needed in the fight against obesity. Centralised purchasing, tiered pricing, voluntary licensing and local production will be crucial to prevent innovation from being confined to the richest markets. In the meantime, big pharmaceutical companies are trying to defend their market shares with strategies such as 'patent thickets', i.e. multiple patents targeting a single product, also linked to delivery devices, in addition to the active ingredient. A recent analysis (also published in the Lancet last February) of patents related to drug-device combinations containing GLP-1 receptor agonists found that 57% were patents on devices, without any reference to active ingredients, chemical structures or therapeutic class. This approach could slow down the development of biosimilars.

