Letter to savers

Arm expands its business: cash flow under market scrutiny

Tech. The group has moved from design alone to the production of chip prototypes. The share price has risen sharply and is trading at high multiples: investors are on standby

6' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

6' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

In the age of Artificial Intelligence (AI), tech stocks are often sold off following the publication of quarterly results. Given the extremely high share prices, even the slightest deviation from expectations and estimates is enough for the market to sell off. This has also happened to Advanced RISC Machine Holdings (ARM). The British group, a global leader in the design of microprocessor architectures, fell by 13.4 per cent in a single trading session following the announcement of its latest quarterly figures (the first quarter of the 2025–2026 financial year). Among other factors, the weak outlook for the second quarter weighed on the share price. Non-GAAP diluted EPS is forecast to be between $0.29 and $0.37. This estimate – at its midpoint – falls short of analysts’ expectations.

TRIMESTRI A CONFRONTO

Loading...

Expansion of the perimeter

However, according to several experts, the real reason for the slump is something else. What is it? The fact that Arm has announced a significant change. The group has decided to move beyond the confines of its business model – which until now has been based solely on licensing the use of its intellectual property – and has announced its entry into the design of physical chips. ‘We are not becoming a chip company in the traditional sense,’ the company said, ‘(...) but we will be going deeper into silicon to accelerate adoption by our customers.’This shift has a specific aim: to shorten development times for users and increase the share of value captured by Arm in each project.

Loading...

LICENZE E ROYALTY

Loading...

The market at the window

So, is it all as easy as drinking a glass of water? Not exactly. Investors, in fact, reacted negatively straight away. According to CFRA Research, ‘the new strategy increases the risk profile and reduces visibility on margins’. And that’s not all. Some market participants are talking about ‘a move that could put Arm in potential competition with various clients’. Barron’s itself went on to point out that ‘the group is entering unfamiliar territory, with higher costs and returns deferred over time’. Against this backdrop, selling pressure ensued. Subsequently, however, the share price recovered somewhat. “Currently,” explains independent technical analyst Silvio Bona, “the shares are trading in a sideways pattern.” Looking at the last two and a half months, the share price fell to “support around the $130 mark and, from there, rebounded”. Clearly, traders are on standby and are (also) pondering the group’s new strategy. “Over the longer term, however, the underlying trend remains bullish. The share price reached an all-time high – on a closing basis – of $186 on 10 July 2024. Subsequently, Arm slipped lower – finding support around the $86 mark on 8 April – before recovering towards the resistance zone around $165.”That said, the market is currently in a wait-and-see mode: it is trying to work out whether the new strategic move will bring added value or not.

So far, we have looked at some ideas regarding valuations and new approaches. But what are the group’s strategic priorities? To answer this, it is useful, first of all, to recall how Arm generates its revenue. The model is based on licences and royalties, with the company (to date) granting only the rights to use its intellectual property. Each contract includes an initial fee, known as an ‘up-front’ payment, which is paid upon signing. The amount varies depending on the scope of the licence. This sum covers access to digital designs, development software and technical support. Once the licence has been obtained, the customer can design and manufacture chips incorporating Arm technology. When production begins, the royalty comes into play. This is a percentage applied to the unit value of the chip sold, generally ranging from 0.5 per cent to 2 per cent. The rate depends on the type of intellectual property, the end market and the year of the contract.

CONTRATTI ANNUALIZZATI

Loading...

Priorities

Well, broadly speaking, the aim is to increase the average revenue per microprocessor. This objective is pursued – primarily – through four avenues. The first is to encourage customers to migrate to more advanced architectures. Armv9, the successor to Armv8, is already the benchmark platform for smartphones, data centres and the automotive sector. Every technological leap increases complexity, performance and also the royalty rate. Newer generations are worth more and cost more. For manufacturers, this is a necessary investment: better performance and lower power consumption, but also access to an ever-expanding software ecosystem.

The second driver, on the other hand, is the increase in Arm content within each chip (known as ‘Arm density’). This includes not only the CPU, but also the GPU for graphics, the NPU for artificial intelligence, and system components for security and memory. Every additional block designed by Arm expands the base on which the royalty is calculated. It’s a question of mix: the more Arm technology is integrated, the greater the value retained by the group within the silicon supply chain. The third pillar, then, is the complete platform. With Compute Subsystems (CSS), Arm offers customers a virtually ready-to-use kit comprising its own solutions. The customer saves months of design work and gains access to a design already optimised for artificial intelligence (AI). For Arm, this represents a significant boost to margins: CSSs generate twice the royalties of a traditional core. But that’s not all. Every platform installed reinforces the user’s technological dependence and drives demand for new updates. In short: it is a ‘matryoshka’ model where each level of integration increases Arm’s share of the chip’s final value. Finally, the fourth focus: the selection of end markets. Not all microchips carry the same weight. A processor for an entry-level smartphone is worth just a few cents in royalties; a chip for data centres or autonomous vehicles can be worth dollars. In this regard, the company is focusing its development on four high-yield areas: cloud AI, automotive, premium smartphones and edge computing.

Given these circumstances, has the company been able to deliver on any of them? The answer is complex. In the first quarter of the 2025–2026 financial year, royalty revenue grew by 25 per cent year-on-year. According to the company, this trend was also driven by the increased adoption of the Armv9 architecture – that is, Arm’s most advanced chip to date. Furthermore, the company emphasises that the Compute Subsystem (CSS) platforms have made a significant contribution to this result. CFO Jason Child emphasised that ‘the new generations of CSS generate twice the royalty revenue compared to Armv9 cores’. On the ‘Arm density’ front – that is, the presence of CPUs, GPUs and NPUs on the same chip – the group also reported ‘an improvement in the product mix, with higher royalty rates per chip’. The ACV (annualised contract value) rose by 28 per cent, evidence that customers are signing broader and higher-value licences.

FLUSSI DI CASSA

Loading...

Risks and concerns

Nevertheless, there is no shortage of issues. On the one hand, Arm closed the quarter with an increase in net operating cash flow; on the other, however, this figure is partly distorted by advance payments received for licences signed at the end of the previous financial year. So much so that the company has clarified that ‘these timing benefits will be reversed in the second quarter’. Furthermore, some experts point out that investment, particularly in R&D, is expected to rise (for example, to support the plan to ‘enter’ the silicon market). This will inevitably put pressure on profitability and cash flow. Furthermore, by shifting its revenue mix from one-off licence fees (which generate cash immediately) to royalties and CSS (which generate cash over time), the company is moving towards a model in which the collection period is extended. In such a scenario, it is therefore hardly surprising that the market and analysts are currently adopting a cautious stance.

Yes, caution. But what are the group’s stock market multiples? According to Seeking Alpha, the price-to-non-GAAP-earnings ratio for 2025–2026 is 98.6 times. On the one hand, the forward non-GAAP PEG ratio stands at 4.5; and, on the other, the forward price-to-cash-flow ratio is 119.5 times. This mix of indicators ‘suggests’, says Seeking Alpha, ‘that the share is significantly overvalued compared with its competitors’. Momentun itself, Seeking Alpha goes on to explain, ‘is weak’. With regard to growth, however, the company shows ‘positive momentum, significantly higher than the benchmark sector’. Similarly, profitability is ‘good’ even compared to ‘the benchmark sector’. In such a scenario, investors must, of course, exercise great, great caution and consider – as part of a diversified approach – their risk appetite.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti