Savings Betrayed

Barclays convicted of fraud against others

UK bank held co-responsible for loss of savings of fraud victim but negligent: school case raised by Fidlaw

 EPA

2' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

2' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

The British banking giant Barclays has been ordered to pay almost 400,000 Euro in compensation to a customer, in a fraud case that is destined to become a school case and a significant legal precedent. The decision, dated 5 February 2026, is in fact a landmark for the liability of banks in cases of fraud.

The Ombudsman's intervention

Fidlaw, a law firm specialising in commercial, financial and fraud recovery litigation, achieved a major success for its client, a foreign company called 'C', in a case against Barclays Bank UK PLC ('Barclays').

Loading...

TheFinancial Ombudsman Servic ('FOS') upheld the complaint, ordering Barclays to repay 50% of the €383,000 loss suffered by the company as a result of an Authorised Payment Scam (APP), plus interest. This decision highlights the responsibility of banks to detect and prevent fraud when fraudsters use fake accounts to launder embezzled funds.

The affair

In late 2021, the victim was duped by fraudsters posing as his legitimate contractor and supplier. The scammers intercepted e-mails, changed bank details and directed payments to five newly opened Barclays accounts in the UK. Despite warning signs such as the rapid dispersal of funds, minimal account activity and discrepancies in payment references, Barclays failed to take adequate action, allowing the fraudsters to embezzle most of the funds. C lost EUR 383,000.35, of which only EUR 90,000 was initially recovered.

The motivation

The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) Supervisor, Jenny Lomax, ruled that Barclays should have isolated the suspicious payments and investigated the account holders' entitlement to the funds first. While acknowledging some negligence on the part of 'C' for failing to detect the discrepancies in the e-mails, the decision fairly divides the remaining loss, ordering Barclays to pay approximately £122,940 (equivalent to half of the loss converted to sterling) plus 8% interest per annum from the date the fraud was reported.

L’avvocato e notaio italiano Francesco Meduri

The consequences

"This decision represents a breakthrough for victims of sophisticated app scams," saidF Francesco Meduri, director of Fidlaw, who welcomed the decision and praised the work of the legal team led by lawyer Elena Hadjikyriakou and consultant Ali Reza Sinai of Selborne Chambers. "It sets a potential precedent, showing that banks cannot simply act as passive conduits for fraud. Barclays had clear opportunities to spot anomalous patterns, such as multiple high-value payments from the same sender to inactive accounts, and failed to take action. We are proud to have fought the C-case and hope that this will encourage greater fraud control across the banking industry'.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti