Towards the Budget Bill

2027 Budget Bill: final negotiations on IRPEF cuts and other demands on the banks

Cabinet meeting at 3 pm. A tax rebate of up to 54–55,000 euros is being pushed through, whilst there is a tug-of-war over funding. The energy clause paves the way for other measures

 salvo77_na - stock.adobe.com

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

At 3 pm today, Wednesday 28 October, the Council of Ministers is expected to approve the Budget Bill. But as of yesterday evening, the web of cross-negotiations between ministries and majority leaders was still in turmoil. On the issue that now looks set to be the budget’s inevitable flagship measure, whether or not it makes it into the final text: the IRPEF tax cut for the middle class.

Support for the middle class

The extension of the second tax bracket had been dropped from the list of measures ten days ago. But not from the ambitions of a section of the ruling coalition, starting with Forza Italia. It was the meetings on Tuesday 27 October, including a further lunch meeting between Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and her deputies Antonio Tajani and Matteo Salvini, that brought tax relief for the middle class back into the spotlight, albeit in a scaled-back form that would extend the 33 per cent tax bracket up to 54–55 thousand euros, and only for one year, pending better times.

Loading...

However, even this first step requires funding. A study points towards a course of action deemed more or less unavoidable by the Ministry of the Economy: namely, a further increase in the bill to be presented to banks and insurance companies.

Put like that, the decision is politically sensitive. And the burden would fall entirely on the shoulders of Forza Italia leader Tajani. In recent weeks, the Forza Italia leader had championed a two-pronged demand: not to put too much pressure on the financial sector regarding the new ‘contribution’ being sought, whilst not giving up the tax relief for the middle class. However, according to the scenarios drawn up in the Ministry of the Economy right up until late on the evening of 27 October, the two options are mutually exclusive: a scenario that would therefore involve financing the extension of the second IRPEF tax bracket alongside a tightening of fiscal measures for credit institutions.

The banking issue

The lever would be a further increase in the IRES surcharge, which stood at 2.5 percentage points until the afternoon of Tuesday 27 October. The rate is now reported to stand at 3 per cent. This would provide the approximately 1.3 billion needed to take this step and cut the second tax rate by ten points for around 600,000 taxpayers declaring up to 54–55,000 euros. Unless, that is, another source of revenue can be found capable of closing the gap without further inflaming the political tensions between the Government and the banking sector.

In any case, the cut would be limited to 2027, pending a decision on how to make it permanent. This mechanism would not be new, as the same two-stage procedure was used at the start of the parliamentary term to introduce the three-rate personal income tax system. But this is precisely where the crucial difference lies compared with the current situation: because the task of making the new income tax structure permanent would fall to the next government.

This turning point marks the final stage of a manoeuvre which, on Tuesday 27 October, appears to have made significant progress in the discussions with the European Commission regarding the terms of application of the energy safeguard clause.

On this point, following days of numerous telephone calls and informal negotiations with Brussels, the Government is said to have drawn up a package that allocates to the deficit – by way of derogation from EU constraints – a not insignificant portion of ‘compatible’ expenditure that was already provided for in the public finance forecasts. This move would allow the government to replicate the manoeuvre already carried out last year – amounting to over 5 billion – through the extraordinary restructuring of the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (PNRR). In this case, the deficit under the derogation would end up covering measures currently funded by the domestic budget, thereby freeing up scope for other measures.

Measures for young people

Without altering the overall scope of the budget, and without the need for a second, acrobatic (and effectively impossible) deviation, the Budget Bill could thus bolster certain items on the agenda drawn up over recent weeks. First and foremost on the agenda are measures to support young people, starting with rent assistance to be combined with an extension of guarantees for first-time homebuyers. In the same vein, there is a move to strengthen tax measures for small and medium-sized enterprises, and the tables could include a refinancing of the National Health Fund, which had been ruled out until Monday evening’s summit.

“As always, the aim is to balance the books, honour the commitments we have made, and continue to focus on the priorities we have set ourselves in recent years,” explained Prime Minister Meloni in her opening address at the Moneta Forum. “We have practically finalised the parameters of the safeguard clause, so we are satisfied,” said Economy Minister Giancarlo Giorgetti at the same event, confirming the introduction of tax relief for the under-30s. In short, by the evening of Tuesday 27 October, the picture was clear: with the not insignificant exception of personal income tax (IRPEF).

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti