We learn from our mistakes

Building alliances to foster inclusion in the company

Research suggests that listening to historically disadvantaged groups may be helpful in understanding which forms of alliance are most effective and valued

4' min read

4' min read

Nobody saves themselves.

How many times have we heard this phrase? So many that, as is often the case with phrases worn out by repetition, they almost become a background with which we all agree, in theory, but then, in practice, where do we start? The importance of alliances in social, organisational and family contexts is, likewise, a leitmotif we have been hearing a lot recently. Acts of alliance - in which members of historically advantaged groups (e.g., whites, men) support members of relatively disadvantaged groups (e.g., racial minorities, women) - are key to generating inclusion in the workplace.

Loading...

However, many well-intentioned managers and executives still struggle to fully commit themselves in this direction. They fear, in fact, caught up in enthusiasm, the possibility of making mistakes. And how can one not blame them? For example, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella has faced fierce criticism for suggesting that women should wait for 'good karma' rather than asking directly for a raise. Although probably well-intentioned and humorous, his advice was considered extremely inappropriate. He later apologised and made clear his support for equal pay.

The British Prime Minister, Sunak, said in an interview a few weeks ago that he gladly helps his wife with the housework. For example, he makes the bed... because his wife doesn't do it so well. And down comes criticism, to no end. And how could it not be so? These 'alliance failures' of high-profile people have led many well-meaning people to fear that their attempts to demonstrate alliance and address inequalities may be equally misinterpreted and attacked by those they intend to support.

Let's take a very common example in which many of us will recognise ourselves. You are a male manager and you notice that your female colleague is frequently interrupted by other managers, while her male counterparts speak without interruption. In your opinion, should you take action to address this sexist behaviour? You might want to intervene and try to help, but you might also be afraid of appearing inauthentic and think that intervention might do more harm than good. Research just published by Lean In, the US-based women's network that helps women realise their ambitions and works to create an equitable world, shows that these concerns are often misguided. On average, alliance attempts are more appreciated than potential allies think. For example, in a study examining alliance towards the African-American community, white participants were asked to read a true story in which an African-American colleague recounted his experiences of racism in the organisation: being constantly interrupted, for example, and always having to perform 'service' tasks, such as bringing coffee to other colleagues.

The white participants then read out the various acts of alliance that could be performed to resolve this discrimination case, from the simple question "how can I help you?" to the more challenging ones, e.g. reporting it to HR. The white people involved in the research then indicated how much they thought their African-American colleague would appreciate these acts of alliance. At the same time, the African American participants read the same scenario; they were asked to identify with the role of the African American colleague and indicated how much they would appreciate the same acts of alliance. The results showed that white people significantly underestimated the extent to which their African American colleagues valued these explicit behaviours. The consistent underestimation of how much people value when others display allyship behaviour also occurs in positive reinforcement contexts.

In a study on gender alliance, male university students made an alliance pledge to support the women at their school. The male students were asked how much they thought the women would appreciate their commitment. Female students were then asked how much they appreciated male students making the same commitment. The results revealed, once again, that the male students underestimated how much the women appreciated the simple act of signing an alliance pledge and revealed the main reason for this: they mistakenly thought that the female students would perceive them as more inauthentic than they actually were and feared that the female students would accuse them of being disingenuous and doing it because they were forced to.

The pattern that was discovered proved to be robust in a number of circumstances. In another experiment, men underestimated how much women would appreciate being celebrated for receiving a promotion at work.

This mismatch between perceived and actual alliance appreciation is important because feelings of appreciation can drive the choice of whether or not to act as an ally. In a study of white male employees, Lean In found that the less people think their alliance acts will be appreciated, the less likely they are to engage in this behaviour. So, given this constant disconnect between advantaged and disadvantaged groups, what can organisations do to encourage alliance? First, organisations can explain how acts of alliance are appreciated by disadvantaged groups more than they expect. Second, companies can consider programmes or training courses that highlight how alliance generates appreciation. A Harvard Business Review study showed that when people witness people expressing how much they admire the alliance, it increases their intention to engage in it. To be clear, it is not up to disadvantaged groups to increase the alliance by expressing their appreciation; rather, we suggest that awareness of this appreciation can and should stimulate the alliance.

Finally, organisations can continuously gather sentiment on the topic among members of a traditionally underrepresented group by asking which alliance behaviours they would value most and would be most beneficial to them, and then share the results with potential allies. In the cited studies, it was deduced that the most valued form of alliance is the offering of direct help, while the use of humour is one of the least valued forms of alliance. Given the findings on misperceptions of appreciation among various groups, research therefore suggests that listening to historically disadvantaged groups could be useful in understanding which forms of alliance are most effective and appreciated.

Now is the time to practise alliance. Not only is it essential for creating diverse, equitable and inclusive organisations, but it is a training ground for building communities oriented towards mutual aid and sincere appreciation for those who concretely put themselves on the right side of history.

*Partner Newton

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti