Piedmont Regional Administrative Court

Verona-Bari flight cancelled, refund via pec without mediation obligation

One family had their flight cancelled within minutes of take-off

by Enrico Bronzo

Aerei, prof. Celotto: "I ritardi? Domanda record e carenza controllori di volo"

3' min read

3' min read

 Stop to the obligatory attempt at conciliation with airline companies for passengers complaining about flight delays or cancellations. This is what the Piedmont Regional Administrative Court ruled in the context of an appeal filed by a family that had seen cancelled a Verona-Bari flight "within minutes of take-off". The judges rejected a portion of a resolution of 8 February 2023 of the Transportation Authority. 'This is,' explained the lawyers from the Leone-Fell & C. firm who assisted the plaintiffs, 'a great victory for consumers. Now there will be no need for a double step to obtain reimbursement".

Referenced regulations on compulsory conciliation

Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding, flight cancellation or long delays were established at European level with EC Regulation 261/2004. As a result, airlines, faced with their own non-compliance, have received increasing economic demands and faced several court cases.

Loading...
Di Palma "Mobilità aerea motore di sviluppo economico"

In Italy, with regard to the immediate recourse to ordinary justice, Article 10 of Law 118/2022 (Annual Law on the Market and Competition 2021) introduced the compulsory attempt at conciliation for the non-judicial settlement of disputes between economic operators managing transport networks, infrastructures and services and their users or consumers.

The transport regulation authority (Art), in its resolution 21/2023, adopted regulations on the modalities for the non-judicial settlement of disputes between economic operators operating transport networks, infrastructure and services and users or consumers.

The law specifies that the proceedings must be concluded within 30 days of the submission of the relevant petition and that only once this has been completed can recourse be made to ordinary justice.

How the Leone-Fell & C. firm convinced the judges

.

Simona Fell, of the studio Leone-Fell & C., explains to Il Sole 24 Ore how the firm's lawyers convinced the Piedmont Regional Administrative Court. Under the spotlight ended precisely the article 10 of law 118/2022 "Alternative dispute resolution procedures between economic operators that manage networks, infrastructures and transport services and users or consumers" that, precisely, introduced the mandatory attempt at conciliation in question. Together with Annex A to Resolution 21/2023 of Art.

"First of all," explains the lawyer, "the clear disparity between a consumer who seeks reimbursement at his own expense and an airline that uses lawyers has been demonstrated. All the more so if the injured passenger wanted to use a lawyer in turn, because there is no provision for the reimbursement of expenses incurred in the attempt at conciliation'.

Taking into account that the legal fees could be higher than the cost of the air ticket. It also seems obvious both the an and the quantum being a cancelled flight and the price of a ticket.

In addition to this, the court took into account the procedural aggravation of retaining - for the purposes of the claim - modes of communication with the airline, such as e-mails or WhatsApp messages. One thinks of the elderly, but also, regardless of the age of the passengers, of the inconvenience created by a cancelled airline flight, where the priorities are objectively other than thinking about how to get back the money spent unnecessarily and 'preserving' it.

Again, in terms of costs and commitment - physical, mental and economic - consider that one has to go through the Conciliaweb portal of Agcom (Communications Guarantee Authority), which can only be activated with Spid, Cie (electronic identity card) or the national services card. And if one does not have it? If one had to, there would be costs.

In short, the clauses in question seemed vexatious to the judge. So how will it end? Once the rules of EC Regulation 261/2004 are back in force, it will be sufficient to send an e-mail to the company to request reimbursement for the cancelled flight. A very fast procedure, moreover, compared to the estimated time for the procedure set aside.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti