I tentativi estremi di rianimare i negoziati tra Usa e Iran
dal nostro corrispondente Marco Masciaga
Equity is the starting line to ensure growth prospects for all boys and girls in our country. Yet it increasingly seems to resemble a finishing line, with an obstacle course that leaves thousands of minors behind. Children and adolescents living in fragile contexts, forced to make sacrifices that jeopardise their aspirations. A destiny that is anything but immutable, if we consider that educational poverty, the cause of many inequalities, is in turn influenced by factors on which public policies have the potential to have an impact, focusing on childhood and adolescence as the country's main asset and investing in rights and opportunities starting from the most marginalised places.
The picture of childhood in Italia is made up of numbers that should make us think: 2.4 million minors at risk of poverty and social exclusion, more than one in four, and 1.28 million minors in absolute poverty. More than one child in 10 (13.8 per cent), therefore, lives in families that cannot afford goods and services that are considered essential; this is the highest share in the last decade.
The consequences are immediate: one in six teenagers say that their parents have difficulty meeting the expenses for food, clothes and bills, a similar proportion give up going out or playing sports for financial reasons, three in ten cannot afford to take a holiday. These numbers alone do not tell the story of what is happening. Poverty, the figures forcefully show, is not just a lack of resources: it is a lack of possibilities.
Economic differences quickly turn into differences in prospects and aspirations. Among struggling teenagers, more than one in four think they will have to leave school early to work (about 20 percentage points higher than their peers in better socio-economic conditions). More than 40% would like to go to university but fear they cannot afford it (compared to 10.7% of those living in better conditions). Almost seven out of ten are not sure they will be able to find a decent job.
The picture is even more complex if we look at the structural fracture lines, starting with territorial inequalities, to which further elements that increase distances are added. For example, migratory background, together with the unfairness of citizenship legislation: among first-generation students, only a little over a third choose high school, a percentage that remains lower even among the best, the so-called top performers (48.7% compared to 60.7% of students without a migrant background). Similarly, among the 'very good' pupils, only 61.1% of first generation migrant pupils imagine a university future, against 74.7% of their native Italian peers.