Oncology

Colon cancer: how a protein predicts who will not respond to chemotherapy

The Irccs Candiolo research published in Cancer Discovery was based on tumour organoids and aims to recognise patients unlikely to respond to Folfiri in advance and pave the way for alternative therapeutic strategies

by Livio Trusolino *

3' min read

3' min read

Chemotherapy is the standard treatment for most patients with inoperable metastatic colon cancer, but responses in terms of disease control only occur in about half of the cases, leaving the other half exposed to ineffective therapy and side effects. My laboratory at the Candiolo Institute - Irccs has studied the mechanisms underlying this resistance using tumour organoids, miniature three-dimensional replicas obtained from patient samples.

 

Loading...

Focus on Folfiri

.

We focused on Folfiri, a chemotherapy treatment that almost all patients receive during the clinical course. The first observation was that susceptible organoids suffered severe DNA damage after exposure to this type of therapy, while in resistant ones the DNA appeared largely intact: a clue suggesting that resistance was linked to a high capacity for repairing lesions to the DNA structure caused by chemotherapy. There are many enzymes that restore DNA integrity after genotoxic damage, so we began the patient - and at times frustrating - work of systematically analysing the activity of these molecules, looking for a candidate that would work particularly well in resistant tumours.

 

The breakthrough came after months of unsuccessful experiments, when we found that the RAD51 protein was clearly more highly expressed and more active in resistant organoids. The finding was clear, but remained correlative. We then artificially inserted RAD51 into sensitive models, and verified that they became resistant. Finally, we had found a functional marker causally associated with non-response.

 

Task Force Italy-Spain

.

The next step was to verify the predictive value of RAD51 in the clinical setting. The validation procedure was technically simple, as the marker is easily measured on routine diagnostic samples. The difficulty lay in collecting a large and reliable case series of patients with a known response to Folfiri. Silvia Marsoni, laboratory chief at Ifom in Milan, and Salvatore Siena, head of oncology at Niguarda, helped us in this effort. Together, they cohosted a task force of clinicians from Niguarda and several hospitals in Barcelona and Valencia who quickly enabled us to assess RAD51 expression in some eighty clinically well-characterised patients. This multicentre study, which we called Iris, showed that high levels of RAD51 are associated with non-response to Folfiri not only in experimental models, but also in patients.

 

The New Perspectives

.

At this point we were able to identify patients with a high probability of non-response to chemotherapy, but the study remained mute from the point of view of new treatment perspectives: could we only advise against treatment, or even suggest some options for resistant patients? The final step was to construct a therapeutic hypothesis based on the fact that RAD51 causes resistance. Direct blockade of RAD51 is not clinically feasible, but an alternative has proved very promising: inhibiting ATM, a protein that controls the function of RAD51 upstream. In our models, the combination of an ATM inhibitor with Folfiri restored significant therapeutic efficacy. The good news is that drugs against ATM are already in clinical trials, so together with Silvia Marsoni we are starting to warm up the engines to contact the pharmaceutical companies that produce ATM inhibitors and involve them in the design of an ad hoc study.

 

The forces on the field

.

The work was recently published in Cancer Discovery, where it was praised for its dual value of recognising patients unlikely to respond to Folfiri in advance and paving the way for alternative therapeutic strategies. This was a collective endeavour that saw Andrea Bertotti, who co-directs the lab with me, at my side in supervision and coordination. The experiments were designed and conducted mainly by Marco Avolio and Simonetta Leto; the analyses were carried out in collaboration with the Pathological Anatomy Unit directed by Caterina Marchiò and the Oncological Surgery Division directed by Felice Borghi at the Candiolo Institute. The funds that made the success of this project possible came from the Fondazione Piemontese per la Ricerca sul Cancro, which supports the Candiolo Institute's cancer treatment and research activities, and from the 5X1000 AIRC programme.

 

 

 

*Director of the Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Candiolo Institute
Full Professor, Department of Oncology, University of Turin

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti