Data are not neutral: how female researchers are changing the way we read society
From public statistics to demography to data visualisation: scholars such as Linda Laura Sabbadini and Chiara Saraceno show how the way we construct data influences policies and the interpretation of social phenomena
For a long time, data were told as if they were neutral. Yet, over the past decades, social research has shown that numbers also arise from choices. What to measure, how to measure it, which variables to include and which to leave out: every dataset is the result of preliminary questions. And when the questions change, the picture that emerges also changes.
Today, gender statistics are at the centre of a cultural transformation with initiatives such as the European gender data hub of the European institute for gender equality, and with the systematic introduction of sex-disaggregated indicators by institutes such as Istat. Further demonstrating how the way in which we observe inequalities is evolving, mention should also be made of the Generational Impact Assessment tool introduced in Italia last year to ask institutions to systematically measure the social and environmental effects of laws on different segments of the population over time, particularly on younger generations and vulnerable groups. An important part of this transformation is driven by statistics, demographers, economists and data journalists who are helping to redefine the way we observe social and economic phenomena. It is not simply a question of an increased presence of female professionals in research centres, but a change in the analytical gaze. The systematic introduction of gender indicators in public statistics, the reinterpretation of demographic data in the light of new family forms, and the revision of labour and welfare metrics are concrete examples of how the perspective with which we construct data can change our understanding of reality.
The numbers of women and violence against women
One of the most influential figures in this process is statistician Linda Laura Sabbadini, who for many years headed the Department for Social and Environmental Statistics at Istat. Sabbadini was one of the main promoters of the systematic introduction of the gender perspective in Italian official statistics. In the 1990s she spearheaded the construction of innovative surveys on topics that until then had been little explored in public statistics, such as violence against women, the use of time from a gender perspective and the transformation of families. The ISTAT survey on gender-based violence, started in 2006 and updated in subsequent years, was one of the first in Europe to produce comparable data on this phenomenon. Thanks to these surveys, it has been possible to estimate that approximately 31.5 per cent of women between the ages of 16 and 70 have experienced some form of physical or sexual violence during their lifetime. Numbers that have had a direct impact on the public debate and the construction of prevention and victim support policies.
Gender violence is the focus of the work of sociologist Giusy Muratore, who has been at ISTAT since 1994 and has practically always been concerned with violence against women, collecting numbers and data, coordinating research, making sense of this collection and understanding and explaining a dramatic phenomenon that still cannot be broken down. At Istat, she is a research manager and head of the working group on gender violence. The latest very important survey (the first part) was published on 25 November 2025, eleven years after the previous one, in 2014.
The focus of demography: the birth rate at the centre
Even in the field of demography, data are helping to redefine the way we interpret social transformations. Italia is today one of the countries with the lowest fertility rate in the world. In 2024 the average number of children per woman dropped to around 1.20, one of the lowest values ever recorded in the country. Understanding the reasons for this result requires analyses that combine economic, social and cultural data. Among the scholars who have contributed most to this reinterpretation is Chiara Saraceno, a sociologist who for decades has used comparative European data to analyse the transformations of the family, poverty and social policies. Her research showed how many traditional indicators were no longer adequate to describe the plurality of contemporary family forms and how public policies had to adapt to an increasingly diverse society.


