Here comes Dream Machine that promises text-realistic AI videos. Our test
The release of the new text-to-video artificial intelligence is part of a burgeoning landscape in the field of generative artificial intelligence
4' min read
4' min read
Californian start-up Luma AI has unveiled Dream Machine, a visual storytelling tool that uses artificial intelligence to create videos that are made from textual prompts, thus allowing the content and style of the video to be defined. In short, realistic videos from simple textual descriptions (text to video), as already done by more renowned competitors such as OpenAI's Sora, Stable Diffusion and Sintesi.
As with competitors, the content generated by the artificial intelligence is immediate and can start from any description, for example, 'show me a young girl walking in the rain in Times Square'. The system, thanks to the instructions entered in the prompt, generates in a few minutes a five-second video that faithfully reproduces the described scene. In addition, Dream Machine also allows you to upload images to be animated, always accompanied by a prompt, thus allowing for extreme customisation.
The big news about Luma AI, which differentiates it from its competitors, is that it can be used for free, simply by registering on the Luma AI website. Of course, without a subscription there are limits, which currently lie in the ability to generate 30 videos in a month and the presence of a watermark. If one wishes to have more freedom, one can decide to join the paid plans, starting with the $29.99 Standard plan, which will allow one to generate up to 120 videos in a month. Videos can be downloaded to the PC or even to smartphones.
Our test
It was easy to put Dream machine to the test. We made the first attempt starting with a photo, specifically Silvia Gottardi of Cicliste Per Caso cycling along a road in Cilento.
The result generated by Dream Machine is smooth, the shot of the scene has good kinematics with the country behind it realistic. Too bad that the cyclist's movements are rather contrived, along with the bike appearing without some frame details. The result is not the best and the video can certainly be improved.



