Sustainability

Energy saving, food industry's effort to reduce consumption increases

Amortisation times are increasing, but this means resorting to more impactful interventions: on average, a cost reduction of 30% can be achieved

L’industria dolciaria è tra le più energivore

3' min read

3' min read

It is not a question of size class. From small and medium-sized enterprises to large multinationals, the domestic (highly energy-intensive) food industry pays the price for energy costs that are now considered unsustainable. Hence the rush to equip themselves with heat recovery technologies or photovoltaic systems. With a difference from the past. Until a few years ago, companies discarded investments in energy efficiency that could not be amortised within a maximum of six to twelve months.

"Now," says Alessandro Brizzi, general manager of Renovis, an energy service company from Vabrio D'Agogna, in the province of Novara, "we focus on interventions that can be amortised in about three years, sometimes even in six or seven. This means that the degree of sensitivity towards sustainable production has also grown. Our goal is not only energy efficiency but also the recovery and utilisation of waste, with a view to the circular economy'.

Loading...

But what is the payback time, the time it takes for a company to cover its expenditure thanks to the energy savings achieved? "Average cost reductions of 30% can be achieved,' Brizzi explains. 'For payback time there is no average value, as different interventions give different results. In any case, with heat recovery we usually oscillate between one and three years, with photovoltaics the range is two to six years".

Thus in a bakery industry, the payback period for the cost of a heat recovery system can vary from 18 to 36 months; in a company in the canning industry it can be as much as 30 months. And it is worth mentioning that in the bakery industry alone - with 46,000 companies and a turnover of 13 billion - Renovis estimates energy waste at 25%.

Today, awareness of the need to reduce energy consumption is the common thread linking all food companies. The problem is generated by the country system. Not only because investments in energy efficiency are often blocked by an asphyxiating bureaucracy. "We pay four times more for electricity than Spain, twice as much as in France, 30-40% more than in Germany, recalls Antonio Feola, Head of Raw Materials and Sustainability at Unionfood, which includes 530 companies owning 900 brands, with a total turnover of 56 billion, of which 26 billion is generated by exports.

'The price of electricity is linked to the price of gas and this does not allow for lower prices,' Feola continues. 'And often companies are unable to complete investments because of long and tortuous authorisation procedures. A Trentino company that is an associate of ours has been waiting for over a year for the go-ahead to build an agri-voltaic park for which, moreover, it has already obtained funding: and we are by no means talking about an exception'.

Canning and bakery industry, dairy production, water packaging: these are the food sectors that pay tariffs, putting them at a competitive disadvantage in the global market. Not to mention that food and beverage companies must also comply with the ETS (Emission Trading System), the European Union's main tool for combating climate change and reducing greenhouse gas emissions in a cost-effective manner. The system is based on the principle that the more you pollute, the more you pay: one of the factors that, together with higher production costs, is helping to push companies towards reduced energy consumption and sustainable production. But it is still an obstacle race. "Because we need an immediate reduction in energy prices together with decisive action at territorial level to streamline procedures," Feola explains.

Despite the brakes, attention remains high. Also as a matter of reputation, as Brizzi points out. "In many manufacturing sectors a policy aimed at safeguarding the environment guarantees a powerful return on image that many companies now consider indispensable," Brizzi explains. This is also the case for those in the food & beverage sector.

Technological innovation now makes it possible to obtain a greater amount of heat with lower oven temperatures than in the past and smaller surfaces of the recovery machine. Always bearing in mind that many food companies work around the clock and do not want to interrupt the production cycle. If sensitivity is widespread regardless of company size, the investment planning changes instead.
"In a small company the decision-making chain is short," explains Brizzi, "but sometimes it is more difficult to get to the intervention. With multinationals, which have precise policies, it is often easier". Geographical differences remain with regard to the number and amount of investments. The largest number of companies engaged in efficiency plans is concentrated in the northern regions.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti