ESG and sports companies, focus on a highly polarised sector
Green Media Lab analysed 20 sports companies. Some have already consolidated their ESG path. Others are still far behind
3' min read
Key points
3' min read
Some are already aligned with international standards, while many others have not yet reached the minimum levels of sustainable governance. A 'strongly polarised' picture emerges from the first national survey promoted by Green Media Lab with the support of the Italian Outdoor Group, dedicated to the state of ESG maturity in the sports sector, presented at the eleventh edition of Outdoor & Running Business Days, the trade event of reference in Italy for the outdoor and running market organised by the MagNet group, publisher among others of Outdoor Magazine.
The Studio
.The study examined twenty Italian companies (Tecnica, Vibram, La Sportiva, Grisport, Scarpa, Montura, Oberalp, F.lli Campagnolo, Ferrino, Aku, Garmont, Manifattura Valcisom/ Karpos Outdoor, Asolo, Garsport, C.A.M.P., Kong, Mondeox, Zamberlan, Crazy, MGM) with a turnover in excess of ten million euro, "assessing them on the basis of ten key indicators, including the presence of an ESG strategic plan, the adoption of eco-innovation practices, supply chain management, climate strategy and Diversity & Inclusion policies".
"With this research, Green Media Lab wants to offer a concrete tool to map the level of maturity of the Sport & Outdoor sector on ESG issues," comments Daniele DeNegri, CEO of Green Media Lab. "The results speak for themselves: the panorama is still strongly polarised between structured realities and companies that are struggling to embark on a solid path. Our commitment is to stimulate awareness, accompany change, and promote a culture of sustainability capable of generating real impact and of being effectively communicated, transforming itself into a strategic lever of competitiveness'.
Performance to improve
.To complement the survey, a qualitative phase was also carried out, targeting the companies with the lowest ESG performance, through a dedicated consultation with the aim of investigating the reasons for 'poor or lack of communication of environmental and social commitments'.
"Among the most frequent reasons were the lack of economic resources," the initiators of the initiative emphasise, "the lack of structured data and the absence of solid impact measurement.

