EU Parliament

Tensions in the European centrist bloc: halt to negotiations on corporate sustainability

The European Parliament rejects the negotiating mandate, highlighting internal divisions. The future of the regulatory simplification packages is uncertain

From our correspondent Beda Romano

La Presidente della Commissione europea Ursula von der Leyen interviene durante un dibattito sulla preparazione della riunione del Consiglio europeo, al Parlamento europeo di Strasburgo, nella Francia orientale, il 22 ottobre 2025. (Foto di FREDERICK FLORIN / AFP)

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

BRUSSELS - Signs of tension are multiplying in the centrist bloc that supports the European Commission. The latest indication came on Wednesday when the European Parliament in a secret vote rejected the mandate by which Strasbourg was to negotiate an agreement with the Council on the revision of two directives relating to the social and environmental sustainability of companies. The risk is that in the future other simplification packages could be the cause of similar political splits.

The subject of the debate on Wednesday was the legislative package proposed by the European Commission at the beginning of the year and aimed at a simplification of two texts known by their English acronyms CSDD and CSRD. The legal affairs committee had drawn up a negotiating mandate, which was then rejected in plenary with 318 no votes, 309 yes votes and 34 abstentions. As mentioned, the vote was secret, but it later emerged that the majority was obtained thanks to the votes of popular, nationalist and even socialist MEPs.

Loading...

According to information gathered in parliamentary circles, 31 Socialist MEPs warned on Tuesday evening that they would oppose the negotiating mandate, betraying the understanding reached by the centrist bloc, made up of Populars, Socialists and Liberals. The choice shifted the needle of the scales, leading to the rejection of the text. The President of the European Parliament, Roberta Metsola, commented today, Thursday 23 October: 'Among the MEPs, there are those who wanted a more incisive mandate and those who wanted it less incisive.

The affair highlights the tensions in the centrist bloc. This is not the first time this has happened. In the past, similar situations have arisen in the areas of the budget or immigration. In this case, however, the choice of some socialists is significant because it reflects a betrayal of the political understanding reached at parliamentary group level. At this point, the text of the mandate will be voted on in the plenary, amendment by amendment. The final outcome is very uncertain.

Today, at a press conference, President Metsola was reassuring: 'Parliament is fully committed to the regulatory simplification agenda. It intends to fulfil its task. We have no time to lose (...) Many national leaders I have spoken to recognise that they have a role to play in bringing Members of Parliament who belong to their governing majority into line, not least because we have very sensitive legislative proposals before us'.

The fear is that tensions in the majority could be repeated on other regulatory simplification packages. After all, many MEPs are called upon in approving these initiatives to go back on their word given just a few years ago. "Wolters syndrome prevails," explains one parliamentary official, named after Lara Wolters, a Dutch Socialist MEP who resigned in recent days as rapporteur of the CSDD-CSRD text because of the too many compromises she had to accept.

The European Commission has already presented several simplification proposals, which are currently being discussed in the Council and Parliament. The EU executive itself presented this week its work programme for 2026, in which other similar initiatives have been included. Regulatory simplification is a workhorse of many European countries, which are under pressure from the business world to demand fewer rules and fewer burdens.

On the sidelines of today's European summit here in Brussels, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz was rather harsh: 'The decision of the European Parliament is unacceptable (...) it is a fatal mistake, and it must be corrected. Now we have to discuss again with the political groups in the European Parliament how this can be done, but things cannot continue like this. What is needed now is a really quick decision in the European Union regarding the competitiveness of European industry'.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti