More protectionism

European Council: the EU’s latest moves amid tariffs on China and the situation in Ukraine

The EU-27 are rallying to respond to Beijing, with greater difficulty in reaching a consensus on Kyiv’s accession and the negotiations with Moscow

by Beda Romano

La Presidente del Consiglio, Giorgia Meloni, a Bruxelles per partecipare ai lavori del Consiglio europeo, 18 giugno 2026 ANSA  ANSA

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

FROM OUR CORRESPONDENT

BRUSSELS – Buoyed by the recent G7 summit, where the European Union defended its interests regarding Ukraine, the EU-27 intend to make the most of the two-day European Council meeting which opened today, 18 June, to attempt to strengthen the EU’s position on the international stage, in particular by adopting a more combative and less naive stance towards China regarding economic imbalances, and by relaunching the enlargement process with Kyiv, partly to play a role in any future negotiations with Moscow.

Loading...

Some particularly significant figures have been circulating for days. The trade deficit with China rose by 15 per cent year-on-year in 2025, to 360 billion euros. By now, all member states are having to contend with a trade deficit with China. On the other hand, China is a global producer of industrial goods, often subsidised by the state (see *Il Sole 24 Ore* of 13 May). Some member states, in particular Germany, are facing a real risk of deindustrialisation.

Ue-Cina, Von der Leyen e Costa a Pechino: l'incontro col premier Li Qiang

In today’s discussion, the leaders had set themselves a number of objectives: to draw up a shared analysis of the situation; to assess the tools available to counter China’s often unfair competition; and to provide guidance to the European Commission as far as possible. “China’s production overcapacity is clear to everyone,” explains a national diplomat. “We must, on the one hand, defend ourselves and, on the other, improve our competitiveness.”

The idea that has been circulating in recent days of devising new protectionist measures does not appear to be gaining traction. “It is more important to use the tools already on the table,” explained an EU official. Attention is turning to anti-dumping and anti-subsidy measures, as well as safeguards against sudden surges in imports of certain products. European legislation also provides for anti-coercion measures, as well as measures against third-country investments in critical sectors.

The focus of European interventionism in the economic sphere is shifting towards greater protectionism. Luxembourg’s Prime Minister Luc Frieden yesterday expressed his support for dialogue with China, whilst insisting that trade relations must be fair and not ‘a one-way street’. It is not yet clear where the European pendulum will settle, although there is already a clear trend towards greater consensus amongst member states on the need for swifter and more effective protectionist measures.

Enlargement to include Ukraine is also a key issue in the effort to increase the Union’s influence, at least in the eyes of many leaders. “It has been a historic week for Ukraine,” said European Council President António Costa ahead of the summit. “ “On Monday, we formally opened negotiations with a view to the country’s full accession to the European Union. And at the G7, we reached a joint declaration with clear and strong support from all countries for Ukraine.”

At least at this stage, the (gradual) enlargement of the European Union is seen as a means of strengthening the political position of Brussels and Kyiv vis-à-vis Moscow, at a time when Washington appears, for the time being, to have resumed its support for the country in its war against Russia and hopes for an end to the conflict are growing. For the time being, support for Kyiv should be viewed through a geopolitical lens, and therefore setting aside the doubts held by many countries regarding the country’s actual accession.

In this regard, President Costa’s decision to open a diplomatic channel with Moscow has taken some governments by surprise. “There must be someone on the other side willing to make peace,” said Latvian Prime Minister Andris Kulbergs. Otherwise, “there is no point in seeking contact”. Lithuanian President Gitanas Nauseda added on Bloomberg TV: “I don’t think this is the right time to start negotiations with Vladimir Putin, because he doesn’t want to see us at the negotiating table.”

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti