Family doctors uncertain about the future, need a push on territorial reform
Three out of four believe in technology and ask institutions for help to improve digital tools, reduce bureaucracy and increase listening
Key points
The majority of family doctors in Tuscany continue to feel marginalised in territorial healthcare: only a part fully recognises themselves in the territorial reorganisation reform envisaged by the DM77, while two thirds (65%) see themselves as possible 'directors' of the assistance network, without however managing to translate this awareness into daily practice.
In detail, then, three quarters of family doctors believe in technology but not in the system. That is, they are willing to use a digital platform to communicate with patients (79 per cent), they consider a network connected to the Electronic Health Record (76 per cent) to be useful, but 75 per cent of doctors still do not believe in bottom-up healthcare, and finally, eight out of ten doctors ask the institutions for help with better digital tools, less bureaucracy and more listening.
Datanalysis Survey for Healthy Communities
These are the scenario data that emerge from a survey of 300 Tuscan family doctors carried out by Datanalysis for Comunità in Salute, a social responsibility project promoted by the Oloshealth Observatory - a union of purpose between Cittadinanzattiva and Associazione Fondatori Cultura Volontariato-AFCV - with the involvement of the Region of Tuscany, AUSL Toscana Centro, social workers and numerous health professionals.
The study was presented in Florence during the 2nd Community in Health conference, open to citizens, doctors, patient associations, professionals and public decision-makers. The project, realised with the unconditional contribution of the Menarini Group, involved over 60 people - including doctors, citizens, nurses and social workers - in 78 hours of work distributed among innovation, empowerment and organisational development workshops, dedicated to exploring critical issues and proposing solutions.
Designing agile care networks
Three key points emerged from the comparisons: overcoming organisational barriers and obstacles, restoring time and value to the human relationship, and designing 'agile care networks' based on aware people, connected technologies and personalised projects.

