From false invoices to 'rigged' waiting lists, here is the list of frauds and abuses in healthcare
The map of risks in the National Health Service as a lever to enhance transparency, reduce waste and promote fairness of care in an area that as certified by Anac 'cubes' 70.5 billion in public contracts
Key points
From 'undue influence on healthcare activities' in healthcare governance to biased reporting in research. From the misuse of post-marketing studies in the promotion of drugs and devices to the improper certification of professional qualifications. From collusion between participants in tenders for the purchase of goods and services to the re-labelling of products. From false invoicing to abusive practices to favouritism and the diversion of patients to private facilities.
As many as 65 types of fraud and abuse fall into nine areas in the first 'taxonomy' of offences and anomalies in healthcare that the Gimbe Foundation proposes to adopt, in order to standardise language, classifications and monitoring criteria. The proposal is contained in the Report of the Gimbe Observatory 'Fraud and Abuse in Healthcare', presented by its president Nino Cartabellotta at the headquarters of Anac, the National Anti-Corruption Authority, with which it has a memorandum of understanding in place.
Ssn dish "greedy"
The assumption is that fraud and abuse in healthcare are not isolated episodes but 'systemic distortions that run through the entire chain of the National Health Service'. And if in all countries the health sector is a vulnerable one, Italia would present particularly favourable ground, with its score of 53 out of 100 in the Transparency International Corruptio Perceptions Index 2025, which places it in 19th place among the EU Paresi and 52nd globally, worsening compared to the previous year.
The health dish is rich and 'greedy' for possible opacity or malfeasance: the Anac estimated in 2023 that 25% of the total value of public contracts, amounting to 70.5 billion, concerns precisely the assignments in these areas for drugs, medical devices, health equipment and non-health services from cleaning to catering to surveillance. "This figure," comments Nino Cartabellotta, President of the Gimbe Foundation, "although it does not allow us to accurately estimate the economic impact of corrupt practices, it does indicate the extent of the area of public spending most exposed to corrupt practices. It is precisely here that more transparency, digital traceability, timely controls and accountability are needed'.
The taxonomy
The Gimbe taxonomy is divided into nine areas: policy-making and governance of the health system, regulation of the health system, clinical research, marketing and promotion of drugs, medical devices and other health technologies, purchase of goods and services, distribution and storage of health products, management of financial resources, management of human resources, and delivery of health services. "Faced with the extreme variability of corrupt practices and the fragmentation of terminology - states Cartabellotta - a shared taxonomy is not an exercise classificatory, but an operative tool: it serves to speak the same language, measure risks, compare data, orient controls, plan and make prevention policies assessable. For the Foundation, today it is indeed necessary to move from a predominantly reactive model to a preventive one, starting with the standardisation of terminology and the adoption of the shared taxonomy of fraud and abuse in healthcare.

