From ‘I’ to ‘we’ without losing sight of talent: leadership according to Julio Velasco
The leadership principles of the head coach of the women’s national volleyball team: putting people first, managing differences without forcing uniformity, and building trust through the right words and actions
From the stage of the Velasco Day 2026 organised by the ROI Group in Milan at the end of March, the head coach of the Italian women’s national volleyball team spoke to an audience of around two thousand entrepreneurs, managers and professionals about leadership based on listening, valuing differences and the ability to transform individual talent into collective success. Looking back on that speech a few months on, the message from this great sports manager has certainly not gone out of fashion – quite the contrary. In this article, we aim to highlight the most significant points of his speech, focusing on some key components of Velasco’s philosophy: people and relationships, organisational culture and the role of the individual within the group, trust as the driving force behind performance, and the perception of fairness as the foundation of authority.
A team’s strength does not come from uniformity
When we talk about leadership, particularly in a business context, there is a risk of resorting to clichés: vision, motivation and team spirit are words that have been a staple of conferences and management development programmes for years. Julio Velasco, however, takes a different approach and bases his thinking on a premise that is as simple as it is counterintuitive: people come before the team. The coach who led the Italian women’s volleyball team to Olympic gold in Paris 2024 and the world title in 2025 does not offer ready-made formulas for success, but rather describes an approach to leadership that is in line with the needs of contemporary organisations, which are called upon to manage groups that are increasingly diverse in terms of age, culture, sensibilities and expectations.
The key to Velasco’s ‘recipe’ breaks decisively away from the idea of standardisation and embraces the opportunity to bring together differences that are often difficult to manage. In the traditional narrative of sport, the team is almost always portrayed as a unified entity, capable of putting individuality aside in the name of a common goal. But what if we were to turn this perspective on its head and focus on understanding people before even thinking about the results to be achieved? ‘Every single person,’ argues the philosopher-coach, ‘has not only different goals and different motivations, but above all a unique nervous system.’ This concept touches on one of the central themes of contemporary management: the growing complexity of organisations, where managers find themselves managing multiple generations of individuals with different cultural backgrounds and sensibilities within the same framework. It is therefore difficult, if not impossible, in such a context, to apply uniform models of motivation or people management.
To explain this concept, Velasco often draws attention to her experience as head coach of the women’s national team – a setting where very different personal stories and backgrounds coexist, prompting a search for a more sophisticated balance that seeks to celebrate what sets people apart without compromising what unites them. For this reason, even a term widely used in organisational discourse such as ‘integration’ is not at the heart of his reasoning. ‘I don’t use that word,’ adds the most successful and charismatic head coach in Italian volleyball, ‘because it works better when different cultures are shared.’ The organisational approach we need to focus on is no longer merely one of assimilation but must become truly inclusive – a theme that is, after all, increasingly prominent in leadership strategies.
Why the ‘I’ must not disappear
Among the most powerful images used by Velasco, one in particular challenges a widely held dogma found in both sport and business: ‘I do not believe that “I” becomes “we”. The ‘I’ always remains the ‘I’.” A statement at the heart of his vision, which suggests that the “we” is not the result of the disappearance of the “I”, but rather the outcome of the ability to bring together different individualities within a shared project. The importance of teamwork – for years portrayed as a process of gradually relinquishing individuality and espoused by many leaders who foster a sense of belonging through generic references to collaboration or team spirit – thus stands out in comparison to other assumptions.

