Judicial Chronicle

Garlasco, there is no blood in the footprint on the door. The plaster of the footprint is missing 33

Out of 30 bands on which impressions were collected, 18 were analysed, including number 10

by Enrico Bronzo

La traccia numero 33 nella relazione del Ris dei carabinieri dell'epoca della prima inchiesta. (Ris)

3' min read

3' min read

A meticulous job - the one carried out on 17 June 2025 - of verifying the contents of the parcels collecting the findings of 18 years ago to be analysed, if usable, with the latest generation techniques. A painstaking work, certainly not without tensions between the consultants of the parties and the experts indicated by the gip of Pavia, Daniela Garlaschelli, which will last for days - next appointment on Thursday - and which is only the beginning of the maxi evidentiary incident in the new investigation for the murder of Chiara Poggi.

Among the findings is not the plaster scratched from the wall of the staircase near which the girl's body was found and on which print 33 was isolated, now attributed to Andrea Sempio, the victim's friend at the centre of the new investigation.

Loading...

The attempt would be to extrapolate DNA from that find, which has been unsuccessfully searched for in recent weeks by the Carabinieri, in order to further investigate that manata to which investigators and detectives attach great significance.

No traces of blood were found in the prints

.

No traces of blood were found in the footprints. This is what transpired at the end of the investigation, which lasted all day on 17 June 2025.

As reported and gathered by Ansa, out of 30 bands on which prints were collected, 18 were analysed, including number 10. On these, 24 DNA samples were taken without finding blood. With the opening of the envelopes, it also became clear that the prints collected at the crime scene, and now being examined by experts and consultants, are not kept on para-adhesive bands but on acetate sheets.

Therefore with less preservation capacity, about which the consultant of Chiara Poggi's family, Dario Radaelli, expresses doubts. 'It is objective to have them,' he says: it appears that these findings were stored at room temperature. We will see what approach the experts will want to give to their work. We will follow their work and try to make our contribution. The Poggi family,' he reiterates, 'has fallen back into the abyss it already faced 18 years ago. We expect a definitive solution this time'.

Of a different opinion is lawyer Giada Bocellari, who defends Alberto Stasi, at the time of the murder the victim's boyfriend, who was definitively sentenced to 16 years in prison for the crime. "It seems that the exhibits were preserved as they should," says the lawyer.

Lawyer Angela Taccia, who with colleague Massimo Lovati defends Andrea Sempio, was not present. "I considered my presence unnecessary today, as I firmly believe in the skills and professionalism of our consultant, General Garofano". The former commander of the Ris in Parma is scathing: 'I believe in Andrea Sempio's innocence until proven otherwise and I do not expect any sensational results,' he said at the entrance to the Questura in Milan, where the evidentiary incident took place. 'I believe until proven otherwise in Andrea Sempio's innocence and I believe in the final verdict.

We are only at the skirmishes of the evidentiary incident that should 'crystallise' the evidence in a possible trial.

Genetic and dactyloscopic experts will then be called upon to discuss the usability, with the new forensic techniques, of the two genetic profiles extrapolated from Chiara's nail margins already during the appeal bis trial against Stasi.

This is for a reliable comparison with Sempio's DNA, which emerged from the new investigation, and with those of Stasi and all the people who frequented the small villa in Garlasco.

Then they will proceed with the extraction of DNA from the prints from what were believed to be para-adhesive smears including number 10, left on the door of the Poggi's house, and on the material then retrieved by the Ris di Parma or discarded as useless or insufficient for any examination. Trash will also be taken into consideration, including the jar of Fruttolo, seized the day after the murder with the con

feets of cereal and breakfast spoons that Clare, on the morning of the crime, did not finish.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti