Gas, if Ukraine bars the way to Gazprom the only alternative is LNG
At midnight on 31 December, the transit contract expires and from one day to the next Europe risks losing 15 billion cubic metres of supplies that there is no way to replace except at higher cost, by importing (primarily from the US) more liquefied gas
3' min read
3' min read
Trump after all does not need to threaten duties to push Europe to buy more gas from the US. If Russian supplies via Ukraine really stop, the Old Continent will lose up to 15 billion cubic metres per year of cheap fuel that will be impossible to replace except with more imports of liquefied natural gas (LNG). And these will largely come - as is already the case - from overseas.
The first LNG ship sailed to Germany from the new Plaquemines Lng terminal, the eighth in the US, recently opened by Venture Global. And this week Kiev also bought a cargo of LNG from the US for the first time.
Analysts - while excluding the risk of fuel shortages, particularly for Italy, which has a high degree of diversification of supply routes - see no alternative to greater recourse to liquefied gas. And this will inevitably lead to an increase in costs, which could be very accentuated for countries far from the sea and therefore without regasifiers.
As the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Oies) explains, 'with domestic production in decline and no significant increase expected in non-Russian pipeline supplies, the two parameters by which to measure the economic impact of the cessation of transit (of Russian gas to Ukraine, ed.) will be the availability of LNG and the cost to transport it to the affected countries'.
Transport rates increased by 40 per cent in three years
.Acer, which brings together Europe's energy market regulators, in October reported that in three years, tariffs for cross-border gas transport in the EU have risen by around 40 per cent and there is a risk that they will rise further as declining demand reduces the use of pipelines.


