Brussels' response

Greenland, EU uncertain between dialogue and reaction: Extraordinary Council today

Commission President changes tone: 'We will have to abandon traditional European caution'. The trade agreement with the US has been frozen, and counter-tariffs and the use of the anti-coercion instrument are being considered. And even the hypothesis of a boycott of the football World Cup appears

from our correspondent Beda Romano

La presidente della Commissione europea Ursula von der Leyen (a sinistra) parla con l'Alta rappresentante dell'Unione europea per gli affari esteri e la politica di sicurezza e vicepresidente della Commissione europea Kaja Kallas prima del suo discorso al Parlamento europeo a Strasburgo

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

BRUSSELS - For the more combative countries, today's extraordinary summit between the EU heads of state and government will be useful to identify the most appropriate instruments in responding to American initiatives on the Greenlandic or trade front. For the more cautious countries, the summit will serve to take stock of the situation. In the background, the shared feeling of frustration with Washington is strong; the desire to break away from the American ally is still a source of division.

In a speech yesterday in Strasbourg, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen outlined the open questions: 'The change in the international order is not only radical, it is permanent. The speed of change far exceeds anything we have seen in recent decades (...) We will have to abandon traditional European caution (...) The world is changing faster than our mentality'.

Loading...

Afterwards, Ms von der Leyen added: 'Our institutions, our governments and our societies, all of us, must transform the way we think and act'. The Commission President seemed more combative yesterday. Even earlier in the week, one of her spokespersons urged avoiding escalation with the Trump administration, despite resounding threats to annex Greenland and impose new tariffs.

Has Mrs von der Leyen decided to up the ante to dodge criticism of the particularly unbalanced trade agreement signed with the Trump administration last summer? No one has forgotten the photo of the smiling president with a thumbs up next to Donald Trump. Or does the president feel that the European wind is blowing towards more assertiveness towards the United States? Probably both factors weigh in.

Today's summit will at least serve to take stock of the situation. On the trade front, the EU may respond to threats of new tariffs from the US with counter-tariffs or with a 2023 regulation allowing it to react to attempts at economic coercion by targeting large and influential digital companies. There are also rumours of a possible boycott of the World Cup taking place in the United States this year.

Besides the Greenlandic case, also at stake is the American proposal to create a Peace Council to be dedicated to the Middle East, and then to the rest of the world. The fear of many is that the role of the UN Security Council will in fact be deprived of its authority. Here in Brussels, work is being done to ensure that the Twenty-Seven have a shared position in dealing with the American proposal. The issue is by no means trivial and has to do more generally with international cooperation.

Some countries have already taken a stand, such as France or Belgium. Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever said: 'Being a happy vassal is one thing. Being an unhappy slave is quite another thing'. Referring to the anti-coercion instrument, French President Emmanuel Macron noted that the mechanism is 'a powerful tool that we should not hesitate to use in the current difficult context'. On the opposite side are the Netherlands or Italy, which still cultivate a conciliatory attitude.

In his speech in Davos yesterday, President Trump confirmed his recondite desire to annihilate the European Union, but ruled out the possibility of using force to annex Greenland. One wonders if this (half) reassurance will not strengthen the hand of those who want to stall. Meanwhile, the European Parliament confirmed yesterday that it had frozen the approval process of the economic agreement signed by Brussels and Washington last summer.

More generally, the Twenty-Seven are aware that US tariffs against six out of twenty-seven countries put the integrity of the single market at risk. They also know that the annexation of Greenland by force would endanger NATO. At the same time, most members of the European Council still seem to want to avoid the break-up of the transatlantic alliance rather than precipitate it. Dependencies on Washington (military, energy, technological) lead many (too many?) to caution.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti