Renewals

Health contract: after bridge agreement spotlight on welfare and working hours

The new Guideline foresees faster negotiations and addresses the unresolved critical issues on non-contractual increases, shifts and overtime

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

The contract round for the three-year period 2022/2024 is, therefore, finally complete. With the signature of the Local Functions Area on 23 February and that of the Health Area on 27 February, the employment contracts for all NHS personnel were renewed. The two aforementioned ones join the CCNL of 27.10.2025 to regulate the legal and economic treatment of 723,000 workers (137,370 healthcare executives, 5,218 PTA executives, 581,148 employees of the sector).

The two recent contracts completed the integration phase of the effectiveness without any particular obstacles by reaching the conclusion, respectively, after 103 and 100 days from the Preintesa. The texts are exactly those of 11 and 18 November, including the attached joint declarations, with the sole exception of a trivial material error that was corrected with regard to the numbering of the articles.

Loading...

Shared bridge contracts

The overall judgement on the renewals is rather easy, because they are to be considered as bridge-contracts closed in a hurry and in an agreed manner by the counterparts, especially in order not to make wage increases lose further purchasing power. In fact, they are almost non-contracts, in the sense that they grant armoured and non-negotiable wage increases and on the regulatory level they provide for minor changes, but do not resolve many critical aspects, which are postponed to the next contract covering the three-year period 2025/2027, which has already been in progress for 15 months anyway.

Therefore, it is much more interesting to examine the Guideline Act of the Sector Committee issued on 26 February in the immediate aftermath of the signing; for PTA management, the document is still being drafted. Browsing through the Guideline Act, an immediate aspect of political significance concerns the fact that for the first time the contractual renewals for management and the sector will proceed in a temporally aligned manner, and the timeliness of bargaining will in itself represent a significant achievement; let us be clear, the unacceptable delays are not overcome because, although negotiations will begin immediately, it can be assumed that they will be concluded more or less two-thirds of the way through the contract.

The novelties of the Act of Address

Paragraph 2 deals with the Financial Framework, which indicates a 5.4 per cent increase of the 2023 payroll when fully implemented. But the contract renewal will also have to ground the extra-contractual increases earmarked by the budget laws of 2024 and 2025. Paragraph 3 provides guidelines on six specific issues. The one under a) postulates increasing the attractiveness of the employment relationship in the NHS and takes up the issue of working time, with particular reference to critical and never resolved aspects such as work schedules, surpluses, and unrecognised overtime. Next, the document mentions contractual and corporate welfare, falling for the umpteenth time into the same misunderstanding as always: if dedicated resources are not provided, welfare will remain an empty box and to think that it can be financed with portions of the funds or contractual increases themselves is pure utopia. More concrete appears the following paragraph, where it is stated for the first time ever that shift workers after six hours are entitled to meal vouchers. Evidently after dozens of rulings in favour of nurses, it was realised that to insist on denying it would be a form of reckless resistance. However, there is an incision in the text that suggests that the negotiation will be anything but simple, because the right will be exercised 'compatibly with financial resources', which could mean that it will be financed as a 5.4 %.

The distribution of revenue

Point (b) reiterates a principle that has clearly existed for thirty years. The CCNL must ensure 'the full and correct use of the funds ..... avoiding the formation of non-physiological residues'. This provision is very interesting from the point of view of the Zangrillo Decree, which I wrote about a few days ago, and the principle of the intangibility of the funds will have to be verified with the legislative amendment that hypothesises shifts of resources in favour of the sector. Also in letter b) are two particular matters of interest. They are the allocation of the revenue of the Prevention Departments and the postponement to supplementary bargaining of the criteria for the incentives for technical functions, as is already the case for the sector and for PTA management.

In subparagraph (c) there are indications on organisational flexibility, and the cryptic wording of the second paragraph might suggest afternoon readiness, a very delicate topic which has been the source of recent disputes. In the remaining parts marked (d), (e) and (f) there is frankly nothing significant, apart from the invitation to specify two particular cases of ALPI. This indication is puzzling, because the text of subparagraphs (b) and (c) of Article 21 of the CCNL signed last week has been identical for twenty-five years, and it is hard to understand why it has been repeated - it is repeated, in the same wording - in at least eight collective agreements without realising that there were 'interpretative uncertainties'. At the end of the document there is the promotion of single contractual texts, a useful instrument that has been talked about for twenty years and never realised.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti