Interview

Italian research that measures invisible consciousness

The neuroscientist from the University of Milan explains the method that can distinguish those who, in the silence of coma, are still present to themselves

by Francesca Cerati

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

When the body is silent and the brain does not respond, how do we know if there is still someone inside? This is the question that guides the research of Marcello Massimini, Professor of Physiology at the University of Milan and Senior fellow at the Canadian Institute for advanced research, among the protagonists, on 10 November, of "Development and evolution: thinking about the future", a series of meetings promoted by the Milan Academy of Sciences and Letters. His group has been working for years on a method that makes it possible to measure consciousness even when behaviour cannot reveal it: the Perturbational complexity index (Pci).

Professor, what do we mean when we talk about conscience in medicine?

Loading...

Consciousness is everything that disappears when we fall asleep in a dreamless sleep or during general anaesthesia: that inner presence that makes us say 'I am there'. We all know what it means to be there or not to be there, but everything changes when we have to evaluate it in others. The consciousness of others is not directly observable: we have to infer it from indirect signals, such as behaviour. It is the principle of coma scales: if the patient reacts, we consider him conscious; if he does not, we consider him unconscious. But this method can fail.

How often does behaviour deceive?

Research shows that about one in five patients classified as non-responsive actually has some form of residual consciousness. These are people who are awake but unable to move or communicate, as in cases of 'locked-in syndrome' or a state of minimally consciousness. In these cases, consciousness is there but does not manifest itself. What is needed then is an approach that measures it for what it is, not for what it does.

Is this where the PCI was born?

Yes. The aim is to find a quantitative measure of consciousness that is independent of behaviour. Pci combines two techniques: transcranial magnetic stimulation (Tms) and electroencephalography (Eeg). A magnetic pulse is applied to an area of the cortex and the Eeg records how the electrical activity propagates. It is like sending a radar signal into a cloud: in conscious brains, the echo bounces back in a rich and diffuse way, passing through many areas; in unconscious brains, on the other hand, the echo is immediately extinguished, remaining local. This difference gives rise to a number, the disturbance complexity index: the more articulated the response, the higher the probability that the person is conscious.

Have you verified that this index also works in physiological states, such as sleep or anaesthesia?

Yes, and it was a crucial step. We measured Pci in healthy subjects during deep sleep, dreaming, anaesthesia and waking, comparing the results with those of non-responsive patients. The consistency of the data is surprising: when consciousness disappears - as in dreamless sleep or under deep anaesthesia - Pci drops dramatically; when it returns, it rises. This gives us confidence that we are measuring something real, not a statistical artefact.

What are the clinical applications today?

"The Pci is already in use in several Italian centres, including the Don Gnocchi Foundation in Milan, with which we have been collaborating for years, and in US laboratories such as the University of Wisconsin and Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. The aim is to validate the instrument in different conditions of loss or alteration of consciousness, to understand how much the measure can help in the diagnosis and monitoring of non-responsive patients. In some cases we have observed a dissociation between behaviour and Pci: patients without motor response but with indices compatible with a state of consciousness. This is valuable information for clinical management."

How is it concretely used in hospitals and what are the prospects?

The test takes only a few minutes, is painless and non-invasive. It serves as an aid to diagnosis, to distinguish minimally conscious from vegetative states, and in the future could be used to monitor changes in patients' state of consciousness over time and to refine clinical decisions. We are working on making the technology more compact and automated so that it can also be used in resuscitation wards. Research centres in the US are also testing Pci on different samples in order to achieve official clinical recognition and make this measure a reliable and accessible tool for everyone. In summary, the objective is to provide physicians with physical, measurable and repeatable information. The Pci does not replace clinical judgement, but complements it, allowing patients who retain residual consciousness to be identified and therapeutic choices to be guided with greater precision.

In your speech at the Academy of Sciences and Letters you will also talk about artificial systems, such as ChatGpt. How does this relate to human consciousness?

The analogy is useful precisely to understand the limitation of our way of inferring. In the silent patient we risk denying consciousness where it is there; in the artificial system we risk attributing it where it is not. In both cases we confuse behaviour with experience. The PCI and other similar measures serve to ground this distinction on a physical and verifiable basis, not on impressions. Only in this way can we maturely address the issue of consciousness, whether human or artificial.

Copyright reserved ©

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti