Lebanon, interview with Unifil commander: growing tension between Israel and Hezbollah, evacuation plans updated
Brigadier General Stefano Messina, commander of the 'Sassari' Brigade: 'It has happened that the maximum alert level has been triggered at our bases, but the real risk, so far averted, is that we will move on to a wider conflict'.
by Andrea Carli
8' min read
8' min read
While negotiations continue to reach a truce between Israel and Hamas in the Gaza Strip and the release of the Israeli hostages captured by militiamen during the 7 October attack, the Lebanon dossier rises. Day after day, the conflict, for now contained, risks deflagrating into open warfare. From the south of the country Hezbollah has intensified the firing of rockets towards the north of the State of Israel and civilian targets. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he had instructed the army to 'prepare to change the situation'. Lebanon is one of the most fragile areas in the entire region: due to its geographical location in the heart of the Middle East, the Cedar Country has been under the lens of regional and global powers for more than 40 years.
Brigadier General Stefano Messina, commander of the Italian contingent and of the western sector of Unifil, the UN mission deployed in southern Lebanon, speaks of a situation that is certainly tense, unpredictable, with attacks of increasing intensity from both sides, of cases in which the bases have set off the maximum level of alarm. The general, commander of the Brigata Sassari, speaks of conditions of extreme unpredictability, of up-to-date evacuation plans, but he also testifies to a scenario that, at least up to now, has not gone beyond the (albeit numerous) skirmishes, thus remaining - and fortunately - within the confines "of the classical grammar of proportionate response". His testimony paints a picture that is certainly on the alert as far as security is concerned, but which, the general warns, 'must not lead to easy alarmism or arouse particular concern at the moment'. "I believe," says Messina, "that the safety of our military is no more at risk than before. However, although they are not a direct target, they could be accidentally involved in the clashes between the parties that have become increasingly frequent and of growing intensity'.
General, what consequences has the escalation in the confrontation between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon had and is having?
The much feared regional war did not break out. This is the first real positive, despite the fact that on the morning of 25 August, the Israeli armed forces launched a massive offensive to prevent large-scale attacks by Hezbollah. The Shia movement responded by launching hundreds of rockets, missiles and drones towards Israel. After 7 October, the date that marked the beginning of the new phase of the clash, the two sides had never mobilised so many military means and weapons. In the end, the sound of Israeli jets and Hezbollah weapons did not go beyond a new exchange of skirmishes, which remained confined to the classic grammar of proportionate response.
Tensions are high, the balance rather fragile: on 18 August near the southern border of Lebanon three Unifil blue helmets were slightly injured by an explosion. Would you consider the situation that has arisen in the last period worrying for our military?





