Managing uncertainty: the new strategic role of boards
Boards must evolve to analyse geopolitical, digital and macroeconomic risks, and become long-term decision-makers
Uncertainty is no longer a temporary phase. It has become a structural condition. And this realisation must change the way boards interpret their role and organise their work.
The current context – wars, trade tensions, deregulation, the fragmentation of the geopolitical balance, and energy and technological transitions proceeding at different and often uncoordinated speeds – is causing profound disruptions to business models, value chains and financial markets. The consequences of this are plain for all to see: growing uncertainty regarding trade and investment rules, the vulnerability of supply chains, market volatility and the gradual weakening of multilateral cooperation. No company, in any sector, can consider itself immune to these dynamics. And no board of directors can afford to treat them as exogenous variables over which it has neither influence nor responsibility.
Finding Your Way in Uncertainty
If instability is set to become permanent, the response must be structural. Not reactive, but proactive. Boards cannot simply take note of events: they must be the forum where geopolitical, economic and regulatory tensions are analysed, interpreted and translated into informed decisions regarding which risks to mitigate, which opportunities to capitalise on, and the areas in which to invest in order to build sustainable long-term value. This is the highest function of governance at this juncture in history: to steer the organisation through uncertainty.
All this calls for a qualitative leap in the way boards operate. Governance can no longer be a predominantly reactive function. It must be able to analyse scenarios, ask management the right questions, and maintain a long-term perspective even when the context pushes towards defensive and short-term decisions. Geopolitical and macroeconomic risk is not an issue to be managed on an ad hoc basis: it must be permanently integrated into boards’ decision-making processes, with the same systematic approach used to manage operational or financial risks.
Added to this, with increasing urgency, are the risks arising from digital transformation, artificial intelligence and growing cyber exposure – areas in which boards are called upon to develop new oversight tools and new in-house expertise. And in highly volatile environments, it is not only the quality of decisions that matters, but also the ability to make them with the necessary speed: hesitation, at certain times, is in itself a choice – and sometimes the wrong one.


