The latest alerts

Melatonin, the ‘natural’ bedtime pill. But is it really safe?

Melatonin is seen as a little help, which is why many Italians take it to aid sleep

(Adobe Stock)

5' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

5' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

Some people discovered them whilst travelling abroad, as a remedy for jet lag, whilst others rely on them as essential aids when it’s time to go to sleep. For many, melatonin supplements are now a given, and taking them has become an almost automatic habit, promising what more and more people are struggling to achieve: uninterrupted, deep, ‘normal’ sleep. Melatonin is a hormone produced by the pineal gland, a mysterious endocrine gland nestled deep within the brain which, like an internal clock, secretes it in accordance with the day-night cycle. When darkness falls, the pineal gland begins to secrete melatonin, signalling to the body that it is time to wind down and drift off to sleep. This is also why experts advise against using tablets and mobile phones in bed, as their blueish light signals to the pineal gland that it is not yet time to release the sleep hormone.

Melatonin is therefore seen as a ‘natural’ aid, which is why many Italians take it to help them sleep.

Loading...

And its synthetic versions, sold as supplements, mimic precisely the natural mechanism of its night-time production. Perhaps this is why, over the years, these sleep-aid tablets have acquired an almost unchallenged aura of safety: they are not a ‘strong’ medicine, nor a sleeping pill that can only be prescribed by a doctor, but rather something akin to a gentle, almost physiological aid. But as always, ‘natural’ is not necessarily synonymous with ‘harmless’, especially if taking these supplements becomes a long-term habit.

Is the reassuring image of melatonin beginning to crumble?

American cardiologists have raised concerns about the safety of long-term use of melatonin supplements. These concerns stem from a study presented at the latest congress of the American Heart Association, one of the leading forums for global cardiovascular research. However, this research does not make a fuss or issue apocalyptic proclamations; rather, it certainly raises a doubt that is difficult to ignore, linked to the question: what happens when melatonin tablets become a daily companion for months, or even years?

The numbers that keep you awake

In an attempt to answer this question, a group of American researchers (lead author Ekenedilichukwu Nnadi, SUNY Downstate/Kings County Primary Care, Brooklyn, New York) analysed a vast amount of data (from the international TriNetX Global Research Network database) relating to over 130,000 adults with chronic insomnia (average age 55.7 years, 61% women), who were followed for five years via their electronic health records. On the one hand, there was the group of people who had taken melatonin for at least one year (65,414 people); on the other, those who had never used it. The two groups were similar in terms of age, health status and other factors, and were compared to observe what happens over time, in a complex and intricate game of ‘spot the differences’.

And given the sheer scale of the data analysed, the resulting findings are difficult to dismiss as mere coincidences. For people taking melatonin long-term, the risk of developing heart failure was significantly higher: around 90 per cent higher than for non-users. And that’s not all. Hospital admissions related to heart problems were much more frequent, and the likelihood of dying from any cause was almost doubled among melatonin users. These figures, at first glance, appear to clearly overturn the mainstream perception of melatonin as a harmless supplement.

Caution is required when interpreting these results

Of course, as the authors of the study acknowledge, these are preliminary findings, so these results should be treated with caution. Nevertheless, they are sufficient to raise doubts about this widely available ‘natural’ remedy, both in American chemists and in our own pharmacies.

However, the scientific reality is never as straightforward as it might appear at first glance, and an observational study such as this – even one involving a large sample size – cannot provide any indication of a possible cause-and-effect relationship (between melatonin and heart failure), let alone the pathophysiological mechanisms that might underlie it. The authors themselves, therefore, urge caution: however substantial it may be, this is a preliminary study, which, moreover, has so far only been presented at a major conference but has not yet been published in full, nor has it undergone the rigours of peer review. This study merely indicates a correlation, not conclusive proof of a cause-and-effect relationship. In other words, we cannot say that it is melatonin that causes these effects on the heart. There may be confounding factors that have contributed to this result; for example, people suffering from severe insomnia might be more likely to use melatonin and might already be more susceptible to cardiovascular problems, perhaps because they suffer from anxiety, depression or other mental health conditions that have a negative impact on the heart. In this scenario, melatonin would be more of a signal, a red flag, or a warning sign of an underlying phenomenon (the negative effect of poor mental health on the heart), rather than a cause.

The (necessary) doubt of the long term

And then there is another unanswered question, perhaps the most important one: is melatonin always harmful, or does it depend on how long we use it for? When taken for short periods and in specific situations (to combat ‘geographical’ jet lag or shift work, or to address temporary bouts of insomnia), its use is generally considered beneficial and relatively safe. The problem arises when the exception becomes the rule – that is, when the use of melatonin supplements continues for months or years, completely outside a doctor’s supervision.

And this is where two often-overlooked aspects come into play. The first is the lack of robust data on the long-term safety of melatonin, particularly with regard to its effects on the cardiovascular system. The second concerns the very nature of supplements: in many countries, they are not regulated as strictly as medicines; this means that dosages, purity and quality can vary considerably from one product to another. What we take every evening before going to bed may not always be exactly the same, with the same dosage and the same bioavailability, and it may even be a product that has not been thoroughly tested.

The key takeaway from this preliminary study – which, however, did have the merit of opening Pandora’s box – is therefore not to demonise melatonin outright, but to put its image as a good, natural and safe ally of sleep into perspective. Melatonin is neither a magic wand nor a universal, ‘one-size-fits-all’ solution. And it may not be entirely risk-free simply because it is marketed as a ‘natural’ remedy. Sleep – real sleep – is the result of a complex balance, comprising healthy habits, regular routines, the right environment and good mental health. Perhaps, therefore, rather than looking for ‘natural’ shortcuts, it is better to ask ourselves a few more questions. Preferably in consultation with your GP.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti