Rome

Michele Mari has won the Strega Prize for *I convitati di pietra*. He would have preferred to win it for *Leggenda privata*

Matteo Nucci came second, Bianca Pitzorno third, Alcide Pierantozzi fourth, Teresa Ciabatti fifth, and Elena Rui sixth

Michele Mari, vincitore del Premio Strega  2026 a Piazza del Campidoglio 8 luglio 2026, Roma.   (Photo by Fabrizio Corradetti / LaPresse) LAPRESSE

5' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

5' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

Michele Mari is the winner of the 80th edition of the Strega Prize, held in Rome’s splendid Piazza del Campidoglio – designed by Michelangelo – with his novel I convitati di pietra (Einaudi). A story with a surprising ending about a class of sixth-formers who place a bet on who the last three in the group to remain alive will be, and whose existential journey ends up taking a twisted turn in this context; it is a ‘cynical’ novel, ‘sadistic’ – to use the author’s own words – ‘modelled on the narrative structure of Ten Little Indians by Agatha Christie’. A book written in less than a month which is not – in our opinion – his best.

This is a view that Mari himself seems to share: when we ask him whether this was the book with which he would have liked to win the Strega Prize, he looks us straight in the eye and says, ‘No.’ When we ask him which of his many books he would have preferred to win it with, he replies, ‘Leggenda privata, perhaps.’ He then added that ‘it’s often not a writer’s best books that win’. And yet, ‘all a writer’s books are like children: pieces of the heart, of the soul. Of course, it does strike me a little that this particular title will be associated with this victory at the expense of others. My task will be to console the younger children a little so that they all feel they are children of the same father.”

Loading...

The Strega Prize thus reaffirms its reputation as an award that often ends up recognising an author’s career rather than a single work. As for a single work, Lo Sbilico (Einaudi) by Alcide Pierantozzi would also have deserved the prize; it came only fourth, with 74 votes. A work which, through literary skill, raw honesty and courage, succeeds in bringing the reader closer to the little-understood existence of a neurodivergent person with mental health issues (“‘The worst part of having a mental illness is that people expect you to behave as if you didn’t’ is the quote from Todd Phillips in Joker cited in the epigraph to the book”).

And Bianca Pitzorno would also have deserved a lifetime achievement award; for decades she has inspired millions of girls and boys to love reading, and for the past ten years or so – has continued to write with lightness, gravity and precision for those girls (and, we hope, boys too) who have now grown up. Starting with The Sexual Life of Our Ancestors (Bompiani, 2015) right up to her most recent work, Sonnambula (Bompiani), the story of a woman fleeing an abusive husband who, in late-nineteenth-century Sardinia, manages to make a living by pretending to be a medium. This novel came third with 84 votes.

I convitati di pietra, considered by many to be the clear favourite for this year’s award, had, in their eyes, lost ground when certain remarks – taken out of context from a private conversation and relayed by Teresa Ciabatti to *La Repubblica* journalist Raffaella De Santis —in which Mari was alleged to have disparaged the intellectual integrity and physical appearance of the writer and columnist Michela Murgia, who died in 2023—had caused a furore in the press and on social media. Several literary critics, literature enthusiasts and online commentators had argued with regret that this would cost Mari the prize.

And yet, the 190 votes by which the Milanese writer narrowly won the award, followed by Matteo Nucci with Plato: A Love Story (Feltrinelli) with just 152 votes – the same margin as in the semi-final – seem instead to suggest that there is a gap between the perception and the reality of how the demands of those calling for non-discriminatory language and attitudes are received in our country, and within the literary world.

The cultural debate that has accompanied the prize throughout its 80-year history, enriching the Italia Republic, as the Mayor of Rome, Roberto Gualtieri, had emphasised at the press conference announcing the final, was scarcely evident during the ceremony to announce the winner, hosted by the actor and presenter Pino Strabioli and the pianist Gloria Campaner, and broadcast live on Rai3. A ceremony focused primarily on celebrating the event’s first 80 years and ‘livened up’ by the screening of photos of the finalists as children...

Premio Strega, Mari: "Io favorito? Un po' ci credo, su Murgia caso chiuso"

What little debate there was stemmed from the daring initiative of a few authors: Bianca Pitzorno managed to slip in a comment on the importance of women’s financial independence, whilst Pierantozzi – dressed as Dylan Dog, in a red shirt and dark jacket — managed to express his hope that in future other neurodivergent people would take to the Strega stage, recounting how he had been a terrible student who had never loved books until he discovered a dictionary of synonyms and antonyms. ‘In hindsight, a clear indicator of the autism spectrum, which was only recognised in my case much later,’ he said, going on to explain that ‘those who experience mental health distress know that words are everything; that they can trigger a psychosis. That voices – auditory hallucinations – are far more violent than visual hallucinations.’ Words, he said with emotion, ‘are also the only thing that can pull me out of my daze and dissociation. Even if their power, compared to madness, is negligible.’

‘We don’t talk enough about mental health issues,’ added Pierantozzi: ‘It’s absolutely vital that I’m here; my life could have turned out very differently. I failed my school exams three times, and I’ve always had communication problems, even though mine wasn’t a verbal issue. The problem was the stigma – the stigma of being dangerous, even though scientific evidence shows the opposite – and the false stigma of being incapable of understanding and making decisions.”

Nucci, on the other hand, when answering a question about the difficulties of life, drew a parallel from Plato right through to Gaza: ‘Life is difficult, yes. Should we simplify it? No. Plato helps us understand just how difficult life is and how much effort we must put in to live it well. Plato is a man who devoted his entire life to building the ideal city. He himself recounted that ever since he was a child he had wanted to devote himself to the polis. He is a man who said that happiness is impossible in an unjust world. Not long ago, we marked a thousand days since the Palestinian genocide. People are rising up, protesting against the political establishment that condones the genocide. Most of us are unhappy because we want justice.”

Mari, for her part, insisted that she was unable to smile, despite repeated urging from family members, colleagues and friends; she consistently refrained from doing so, even when she learnt she had won.

Copyright reserved ©
  • Lara Ricci

    Lara Riccivicecaposervizio curatrice delle pagine di letteratura e poesia

    Luogo: Milano e Ginevra

    Lingue parlate: Inglese e francese correntemente, tedesco scolastico

    Argomenti: Letteratura, poesia, scienza, diritti umani

    Premi: Voltolino, Piazzano, Laigueglia, Quasimodo

Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti