Morandi law, Mattarella OKs rule for collapse victims but points out conflicts with Constitution
The Head of State, in his letter to the presidents of the House and Senate for the promulgation of the measure, points out that the bill on compensation to relatives of victims of road and motorway collapses contains a 'discriminatory' rule for civil unions compared to marriage, as well as 'unacceptable discrimination between the children of victims on the basis of their parents' marital status'.
3' min read
Key points
3' min read
The President of the Republic, Sergio Mattarella, signed the bill for the recognition of benefits in favour of victims of damaging events resulting from total or partial collapse of road or motorway infrastructures of national importance, known as the 'Morandi law', but accompanied his signature with a letter to the presidents of the Chamber of Deputies and Senate and to Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni in which he pointed out some 'discrimination' in the measure that should be remedied. The law was approved by parliament on 20 March.
Mattarella: discriminate civil unions against marriage
The pdl on compensation for relatives of victims of road and motorway collapses contains a "discriminatory" rule for civil unions compared to marriage, as well as "unacceptable discrimination between the children of victims on the basis of their parents' marital status". This was written by the President of the Republic Sergio Mattarella in his letter addressed to the presidents of the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate for the promulgation of the measure.
Problematic forecast of limited funds
."Article 4 demotes to secondary norms the task of identifying the damaging events - present and future - as well as the subjects entitled to the economic benefits provided for, giving these sources a wide margin of discretion. Such a provision does not appear to be in line with the constitutional system," wrote Head of State Sergio Mattarella in his letter accompanying the signing of the bill on the Genoa Bridge. "As constantly affirmed by the Constitutional Court," he adds, "the primary source must ensure a sufficiently detailed regulation of the matter with regard to the criteria for the exercise of administrative discretion. It should also be considered that the law is financed through commitment limits - 7.1 million for 2025 and 1.6 million from 2026 - and having limited resources makes the exercise of the aforementioned discretion even more problematic in order to guarantee the satisfaction of rights".
Government and Chambers give attention to relief
.

