More resources and customised strategies for effective prisoner reintegration
The reintegration process of those serving alternative measures to prison must also be promoted
4' min read
4' min read
If social reintegration and zero recidivism evidently pass through reintegration paths that leverage on education, training and employment, in reality there is still a long way to go to translate good intentions into effective projects.
"In Italy we are unfortunately far behind because the prison still manages to do very little concretely," explains Alessio Scandurra, coordinator of the Antigone association's observatory on prisoners' conditions. "With respect to professional training, for example, the numbers are modest and the initiatives uneven: sometimes they are structured according to the availability of the territory, so they return a greater spendability. But often this does not happen and the return is meagre'.
On the other hand, as regards the start to work, thus linked to the opportunities that, from prison rooms, can then be converted for prisoners into more or less stable chances once they have served their sentence, the picture becomes more varied. The actors at play are different, as is the output.
"If we put aside the great mass of prison labour, which remains unskilled and is mostly conceived as a form of welfare, then there are other opportunities, for example in the prison administration, from making furniture to making shoes for police personnel," adds Scandurra, "which remain in the order of small numbers, but train people for real work with real employability.
The widest contrast can perhaps be seen between the work of the social cooperatives and that of private entrepreneurs. But more than a problem of intentions, for Scandurra, it is bureaucracy and logistical hindrances that hinder the success of many projects proposed by companies.

