One of the 2 absent cardinals

Njue, the cardinal excluded from the conclave: 'I am not ill'. But the Vatican denies it

Controversy over Cardinal Njue's non-participation in the conclave: disputes over official reasons and conflicting statements

by Enrico Bronzo

Cardinale John Njue il 1° maggio 2025 a Roma (Ap Photo/Gregorio Borgia)

3' min read

3' min read

It is a real mystery that of the Kenyan cardinal, John Njue, one of the two cardinals who will not enter the Sistine Chapel tomorrow due to health problems.

The African cardinal surprisingly gave an interview to a local newspaper yesterday to complain about his exclusion from the conclave. The Kenyan bishops' conference then the Vatican itself issued a denial. Njue had also been the talk of the town in recent months because he had adjusted his age downwards.

Loading...
Conclave, la Cappella Sistina pronta ad accogliere i cardinali elettori: le immagini

A communication that in fact on paper made him from non-elector to voter. According to the papal yearbook he is now in fact under 80 years old even though he had previously communicated an earlier date of birth.

An affair, this one, that unites him with another cardinal elector, Philippe Nakellentuba Ouédraogo of Burkina Faso, who was also among the electors after a change of birth date. No scandal however because not everywhere in the world, the Vatican press office had explained, registry offices have the same rigour.

And so, in the face of a new official document, the date of birth can be revised. Returning to the Njue case, however, it was known that he would not enter the conclave for health reasons.

Njue: "I honestly don't know why I was excluded from the conclave, I don't understand why.

"I honestly don't know why I was excluded from the conclave, I don't understand why," the Kenyan cardinal told the Daily nation newspaper, debunking rumours that he was in poor health.

He added: 'those who go there for the election usually receive official invitations and this did not happen in my case.

Njue, who recalled his presence at the conclave in March 2013 when Jorge Mario Bergoglio was elected, clarified: 'it is not for health reasons, really, it is difficult to comment'.

Archbishop of Nairobi Philip Anyolo denies

The first denial came from Africa: the Archbishop of Nairobi Philip Anyolo, in a statement sent to the national media and reported by the Daily Nation itself, explained that Njue had been officially invited through the Apostolic Nunciature in Kenya, but his health condition would not allow him to travel.

The Vatican press office then put an end to the case by recalling that "cardinal electors are admitted de jure into conclave, no invitation is necessary", as spokesman Matteo Bruni said.

In short, if Njue wanted to go to Rome to attend the conclave, it would have been his right and no one would have prevented him from doing so.

But there is more: 'In some cases a check is made, by the Cardinal Dean', in this case Giovanni Battista Re, 'through the Nunciature. In this case it was done and the answer was negative', i.e. that the cardinal would not have arrived in Rome for health reasons. Case closed, therefore, but the mystery of the cardinal's statements on the very eve of the brothers' entrance into the Sistine remains.

Bruni: 'Cardinal electors enter conclave by right'

"Cardinal electors are admitted de jure into conclave, an invitation is not necessary. In some cases a verification is made, by the Cardinal Dean through the Nunciature. In this case it was done and the answer was negative', i.e. that the cardinal would not arrive in Rome for health reasons.

This was said by the director of the Vatican press office, Matteo Bruni, speaking about the case of Kenyan Cardinal John Njue who claims he was excluded from the conclave.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti