Orange wine: not all orange wines are natural. And vice versa.
The differences between these types are by no means interchangeable, but the real question is not whether an orange wine is natural, but whether it is good.
One of the most common misconceptions in the contemporary world of wine is the belief that orange wine and natural wine are one and the same. They may overlap, of course, but they are two completely different concepts.
Orange wine – or macerated white wine – is not the result of a particular production philosophy. It is the result of a technique. In practice, it is a white wine vinified like a red: the must remains in contact with the skins for days, weeks or even months, extracting colour, tannins, aromas and structure. It is this maceration that gives the wine its orange hues and that often more austere and tannic character which many describe as ‘gastronomic’. In the glass, it may be reminiscent of iced tea. In the debate it sparks, far less so.
Natural wine, on the other hand, does not describe a colour or a technique. It refers to a production approach. Although there is no universally recognised legal definition, the term is generally associated with vineyards cultivated using minimal intervention practices, spontaneous fermentation and limited use of additives and sulphites. The two may overlap, but they do not necessarily have to.
There are many orange wines produced by conventional wineries that opt for skin maceration either as a stylistic choice or to meet growing demand. Just as there are natural wines that are perfectly clear and devoid of any orange hue.
To understand the difference, just think of cooking. Saying that a wine is ‘orange’ is the same as saying that a steak is ‘barbecued’: it describes a technique. Saying that a wine is ‘natural’, on the other hand, refers to the philosophy behind the choice of ingredients and production methods.

