Tra emancipazione digitale e difesa dei diritti
di Paolo Benanti
by Marco Rogari
4' min read
4' min read
'A pension bonus at birth' in piggy bank format, which also looks at the education of young people and not only at their pension protection. The proposal comes from Mario Pepe, the newly-appointed president of Covip (the supervisory commission on pension funds), who says he is fully prepared for the challenge of strengthening complementary pensions. Pepe rejects the opposition's criticism of his appointment and hopes for 'a strengthening of the Authority's staff' also in view of a possible enlargement of its competences. The Covip chairman then calls for a truly all-round supervisory role for pension funds, considers the creation of 'an Arbitrator for disputes on social security matters' to be useful, and states that the proposal to activate a public guarantee for pension fund investments to support the growth of SMEs should be carefully assessed.
President, you took office in April. What is your idea of Covip for the coming years?
The aim is to strengthen the institution. Over the years the legislator has entrusted Covip with new tasks, but the Authority's staffing levels have not been increased. I have a hard-working patrol of collaborators who, despite the reduced number of staff, manage to meet their commitments and deadlines. My first commitment will be to ask the government for more funds: the staff must be strengthened, and salaries must be brought into line with those of the staff of the other authorities, because I believe that Covip must grow and also broaden its competences to other fields.
But in this case wouldn't a different organisation of the Authority be needed?
The Authority has two important commitments. The first is to supervise pension funds, and on this side we are autonomous and we decide. And, not surprisingly, the funds are doing well. One of my ideas is to create a support structure to help small funds. Covip's second commitment is to supervise pension funds, but in this case our role is less incisive because supervision of the funds is fragmented and Covip's control is limited.