EU Court

Professional qualifications are invalid if they are not recognised in the country of origin

Case C-860/24 concerns a qualification awarded by a Romanian university. Freedom of movement does not oblige the host Member State to recognise it

Luxembourg / Luxembourg - Oktober 3, 2014: The European Court of Justice on Kirchberg Plateau in Luxembourg (nmann77 - stock.adobe.com)

2' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

2' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

The Court of Justice of the European Union revisits the recognition of professional qualifications in the sector teaching, clarifying the conditions for the application of Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of professional qualifications, transposed into Italian law by Legislative Decree 206/2007.

In an order in the Italian case C-860/24, the European Court of Justice clarified that the principle of mutual trust, on which the system for the recognition of professional qualifications in the European Union is based, cannot pave the way for the movement of training qualifications obtained in the Member State of origin, issued by a private institution which, in that country, has not been authorised to issue training qualifications attesting to professional qualifications.

Loading...

The facts

The dispute arose from a request made by a Romanian citizen who had been refused, by the Italian Ministry of Education and Merit, recognition of a certificate confirming the completion of a postgraduate programme in continuous professional development and training issued by a Romanian university. Consequently, the applicant had been unable to gain entry to the profession of specialist teacher

a qualification which qualifies them in their Member State of origin to practise a regulated profession. It is true that in Romania the profession of special needs teacher is regulated, but in order to benefit from the Directive, the applicant must have obtained a specific qualification.

In the view of the Court of Justice of the European Union, this condition was not met, as the qualification was not legally recognised in the country of origin. Consequently, in the judges’ view, the Directive could not be applied in the case in question; however, the applicant could rely on Articles 45 or 49 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to take up employment as an employee or as a self-employed person in another EU country.

In this case, the Court states that the authorities of the host State must carry out a comparative assessment procedure on the basis of the principle of mutual trust, treating the qualification as valid in principle, but not where the document has been issued by a private institution not authorised by the authorities of the State of origin, as there is no guarantee as to the level and quality of the competences which the certificate is intended to attest.

Therefore, even freedom of movement does not require the host Member State ‘to attribute to a qualification issued in the Member State of origin a higher value than that which it has in that Member State’.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...