The model

Prostate screening, Lombardy forerunner: the challenge is to take it to the whole of Italia

The Lombardy case opens the debate on the possibility of extending throughout Italy a free test to diagnose the most common cancer among men

 Yuliia - stock.adobe.com

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

Lombardy has paved the way. With the first organised and free screening programme for prostate cancer, the region becomes a test bed for a possible national extension in the Essential Levels of Care. A step that, if confirmed, would mark a paradigm shift in male cancer prevention.

The model adopted includes a structured pathway: online filling in of a risk questionnaire, Psa test as the first level, multi-parametric MRI in suspected cases and targeted biopsy only when necessary. By December 2025, some 26,000 completed questionnaires had been registered, with more than 20,000 subjects eligible for the Psa test. This approach overcomes the 'opportunistic' screening that is common in Italy today, which is often disorganised and inappropriate.

Loading...

'It is the first region that has started organised screening for prostate cancer,' explains the president of the Italian Society of Urology (Siu), Giuseppe Carrieri. 'Other regions are moving, but until it is included in the Lea it will remain limited to a few regions.

The topic is also relevant from an epidemiological point of view. Prostate cancer is in fact the most common cancer among men, with over 40 thousand new cases every year - up to 60 thousand according to clinical estimates - and about 6 thousand deaths. Numbers that place it among the major public health challenges. Despite this, male prevention lags behind other areas. "Men do fewer check-ups and arrive later at diagnosis,' Carrieri observes. 'There is a cultural resistance and less attention to prevention that still weighs heavily'.

Also affecting this is the inefficiency of the current system. Opportunistic screening costs the National Health Service about 180 million euros a year, without guaranteeing appropriateness or uniformity. 'It is a non-coded screening,' emphasises the urologist. - Unnecessary examinations are carried out and patients who would really need them are lost'. Among other things, two members of the Siu Board of Directors - Professor Andrea Salonia, a specialist in Urology and in Endocrinology and Exchange Diseases, and Professor Bernardo Rocco, director of urology at the Gemelli polyclinic and a member of the Endourology, Laparoscopy and Robotics Siu Section - were part of the Region's Technical-Scientific Committee in charge of drawing up the screening programme for the Lombardy Region.

The model proposed by Siu aims instead at rationalising the pathway. According to the Altems study, the introduction of organised screening would lead to an increase in costs related mainly to the more extensive use of MRI, estimated at more than EUR 44 million. However, this increase would be offset by the reduction of unnecessary biopsies, with savings of more than 11 million, and the decrease of inappropriate treatments for low-risk cancers, amounting to more than 14 million. The result is a very small overall economic impact of just over EUR 4 million for a more efficient and targeted system. "It means better spending of available resources," Carrieri emphasises, "and reducing waste related to inappropriate services.

On the clinical side, the benefits are equally significant. Data indicate a reduction in mortality by up to 27%, along with a significant decrease in unnecessary diagnoses and invasive interventions. The change is mainly related to the integration of multi-parametric MRI into the diagnostic pathway. "In the past, screening based only on Psa led to overdiagnosis," explains Carrieri. "Today we can select the truly significant cases and intervene more precisely.

This makes it possible to reduce biopsies by about a third and halve the diagnosis of indolent tumours, avoiding unnecessary treatments and improving patients' quality of life. However, the question of adherence remains. 'I would not expect more than 15-20% at the beginning,' Carrieri admits. 'We need time to build up a culture of prevention, as has happened with other screening'.

The challenge is now institutional. The Siu has started the pathway for inclusion in the Lea and is waiting for a response. "We have presented solid evidence and followed all the procedures,' Carrieri says. There is attention from the Ministry, we are confident. Europe is also pushing in this direction, indicating prostate and lung as the next targets of screening campaigns and making dedicated resources available.

The transition from disorganised prevention to a structured system thus becomes a health policy choice. 'Today we spend a lot to do prevention badly,' Carrieri concludes. 'We must make it effective, sustainable and fair. It is a public health issue'.

Copyright reserved ©

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti