Laws and their implications

‘Regulatory inflation’ and the burden on schools: the accumulation of public holidays is not without consequences

The overproduction of legislative provisions does not merely affect the parliamentary system. Through a ‘hidden’ drain on resources and energy, it also takes its toll on citizens and values

Sergei Fedulov - stock.adobe.com

6' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

6' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

The sea, wonders, and events featuring people in historical costume. But also the urban suburbs, energy saving and paper recycling. These are not ideas generated by a random idea generator, but simply some of the issues to which the Italian Parliament has decided – through ad hoc laws enacted over the years – to devote proper commemorations. There are many, perhaps too many, at least according to the official figures: to date, there are 51 national days (in addition to the public holidays marked in red on the calendar), of which 36 were established during the last three parliamentary terms and 20 by the current government alone.

An overwhelming jumble which, in recent days, has prompted the President of the Republic Sergio Mattarella to write a letter to the Presidents of the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate, urging them to rein in this overproduction, which risks becoming counterproductive and an end in itself. This is a distracting trend which, as well as bogging down the legislative process, has significant repercussions for those who, as recipients, must incorporate and implement the provisions of the legislation. This gives rise to no small number of financial and logistical problems.

Loading...

The origins of the phenomenon

To understand what has led to this glut of anniversaries that Italia now finds itself having to deal with, we need to start by looking at a series of causes that are distinct but, in some way, interlinked.

Focusing on the symbols and the message they convey can help to streamline the process and bypass the obstacles that far more divisive legislation usually encounters. “These are laws that are politically easy to pass: they cost nothing and almost always garner cross-party support”, explains Francesca Biondi, full professor of constitutional law at the University of Milan. “For an MP, in fact, they may be one of the few ways to get their own proposal passed and send a message to a community, an association or a region.”

And whilst, for a Member of Parliament or a Senator, proposing the establishment of a commemorative day may give a boost to their reputation, the Houses themselves may also, in some way, benefit from this in terms of safeguarding their role. ‘For years, Parliament has lost its central role in law-making and, through these “commemorative” laws, is attempting to reclaim its place,’ adds Professor Biondi. “However, and we cannot fail to recognise this, when there are dozens of such messages, they cancel each other out and slip into irrelevance. Not to mention the fact that there is a risk of bringing about a devaluation of the law as a source of legislation because, with these measures, rather than regulating sources or behaviour, we merely communicate a message’.

A waste of time and energy

Messages which, when viewed in the broader context, end up costing dearly. And not because of a disproportionate financial outlay – given that, almost without exception, these are commemorations and regulations that do not require funding and which, therefore, cost the State nothing – but because of what they, directly or indirectly, impose on the parties and the areas they affect. ‘It is true that these are zero-cost laws, so much so that they are almost always accompanied by a financial neutrality clause,’ explains Biondi. ‘However, they assign to offices, organisations, schools and sometimes even universities the task of promoting, within the limits of available resources, initiatives. There is a cost, but it is hidden.’

The greatest expense, in fact, is that relating to work and organisation, and the price to be paid – rather than euros – is time. “There is a considerable bureaucratic and organisational burden on the public bodies involved, which are already overburdened by administrative requirements”. This is a factor that evidently does not spare even parliamentary debate: ‘Every law, even the simplest, involves committees and the chambers.’

The risk of ‘regulatory inflation’

The situation is made even more complex by repercussions that are not immediately apparent but are nonetheless problematic. First and foremost, a ‘systemic’ perspective that cannot be overlooked. ‘In an already overburdened legal system, these laws lead to a sort of “regulatory inflation” , with effects that are often impossible to measure,’ continues Professor Biondi. ‘The President of the Republic puts it clearly: the sheer number of these provisions makes it virtually impossible in practice for their provisions to be genuinely effective .’

The practical difficulty, therefore, of implementing such an overwhelming number of regulations is accompanied, in parallel, by a predictable (and dangerous) eroding of meaning. ‘The risk of a proliferation of commemorative laws may lead to a blurring of the hierarchy of values. Alongside Holocaust Remembrance Day to commemorate the victims of the Holocaust, the Shoah and Nazi-Fascist persecutions, alongside the Day of Remembrance for the victims of the Foibe massacres and the day dedicated to honouring the victims of the mafia – all of which hold great civic significance – there are commemorations of a very different calibre. Moreover, historians urge us to exercise caution when establishing ‘days of remembrance’ on a wide variety of topics, as it is not necessarily the case that they always serve as a factor for the unification of the political community’.

And whilst, on the one hand, we celebrate everything only to end up celebrating nothing, on the other, the rush to establish national days can cause us to lose touch with reality and its practical needs. ‘This trend – I note with regret – speaks volumes about the state of health of our parliamentary democracy,’ reflects Biondi. ‘A Parliament committed to establishing a “Day of Wonder”, which is then rebuked by the President of the Republic, shows a certain detachment from reality, as if the representatives were no longer capable of representing the needs of citizens.’

Loading...

A burden for schools

It is the citizens themselves who, when all is said and done, end up footing the heaviest bill. Schools, for example, are often forced to cut back on time (and quality) in their regular timetable. ‘These days are not public holidays. But precisely for this reason, we are encouraged to organise initiatives on the theme on those days, and the main target audience is schools,’ notes Professor Biondi. “If they were really to devote fifty-one days to celebrating something, in a school year comprising around two hundred teaching days, that would mean dedicating one in every four. And so, either teaching or, more realistically, these days are simply ticked off in a bureaucratic and pointless manner.”

And educational autonomy inevitably suffers as a result. ‘It should be up to schools and universities to decide how to educate the public, within the limits of the autonomy granted to them.’

Three possible solutions

How, then, can we put a stop to – or at the very least limit – this jumble of commemorations and measures? ‘There is no legal instrument capable of preventing Parliament from passing a law. However, within the Houses, MPs could agree on shared criteria: for example, the national significance of the commemorative day, the absence of overlaps, and consistency with the existing calendar’, emphasises Biondi. “And then they could pass a law that streamlines the existing commemorative days and merges those that are similar.”

There is also a third option, explicitly mentioned by the President of the Republic: using means other than legislation. ‘Many objectives can be achieved through a parliamentary resolution or through government measures: Dantedì, for example, was established in 2020 by a directive approved by the Council of Ministers, without the need for a law. Similarly, initiatives for schools can be promoted by individual ministries through guidelines and circulars’.

And what if all this were not enough? “The Head of State could also decide to refer back to Parliament a bill that, once again, establishes a national day,” concludes Professor Biondi. “Today, this remedy has been deemed, understandably, a ‘disproportionate’ response to laws which, as the President has acknowledged, do not present any obvious signs of unconstitutionality: which is why he has opted for ‘promulgation with reasons’, limiting himself to expressing his disappointment. In future, however, a more decisive intervention cannot be ruled out.’

It is not such a far-fetched idea. According to recent findings by Pagella politica, in fact, Parliament is already planning to consider new national days to be added to the existing list of fifty-one. For the time being, the committees of the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate are reportedly examining 12 proposals: these include the establishment of days dedicated to eco-spirituality, Italian panettone, Italians abroad, the country’s dairy heritage and silence. As for handwriting, it is even suggested that a whole week of celebrations be dedicated to it.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti