Review

The iPhone Air and 17 Pro test: featherweight, battery and super zoom

Apple's newcomers between innovation (the Air) and incremental improvements (the Pro). Here are the pros and cons

by Luca Salvioli

iPhone Air contro 17 Pro: la nostra prova

4' min read

4' min read

The iPhone Air takes its name and underlying philosophy from the MacBook Air because it is actually very very light and thin. The feeling once you pick it up is very pleasant, it fits in your pocket and you don't notice it, and the design is also successful. Above all, it is something new after years of very similar form factors from one generation to the next. How does it perform in everyday use? We get there, and we also talk about the iPhone 17 Pro, also tested for a week.

iPhone Air is 5.6 millimetres thick and weighs just 165 grams. While the 17 Pro weighs 204, a little more than the 16 Pro, and the 17 Pro Max weighs 240.

Loading...

This weight and manageability is certainly the first merit of this new iPhone, but what I liked most is that it combines this lightness with a 6.5-inch screen. For as much as we now use the phone for photos, for video editing, that 6.5 inch is a very comfortable size. Again as a yardstick, the 17 Pro has a 6.3-inch screen, and the Pro Max a 6.9-inch. And even the basic 17 model has 6.3 inches, while the 16 was 6.1.

Let's stay a bit on the iPhone Air since it's the new thing. The Apple engineers I spoke to at the design centre in Munich, who work on some of the new chips Apple made for this device, focused a lot on efficiency. Everything in here is very small to make room for the battery, which without this work would not have been up to scratch. The single 48 MP camera and most of the components are in fact concentrated up here to leave all the space for the battery. There is also no slot for a physical sim but only for the esim. Why? Again to save space for the battery. Note that in several countries, including the US, the entire iPhone 17 range has only esim. The 17 Pro also changes from its predecessors as a camera design, with part of the component optimisation process in common with the Air.

The choice of materials

.

In terms of materials, Air and 17 Pro have ceramic shield front and back covers, a type of proprietary ceramic glass that is much more resistant to scratches and drops. Air has a titanium frame. In Apple's tests it proved to withstand three times the pressure a human can withstand without bending. Or rather: it bends but then returns to its original position. Trying it with full force with your hands, it flexes slightly but only during pushing.

The 17 Pro (all considerations also apply to the 17 Pro Max), on the other hand, switches from the titanium of the previous two generations to aluminium and does so because it dissipates heat better that way. It's true: the 17 Pro gets very little heat. I have tried to use it with very energy-intensive applications and the difference compared to the 16 Pro and 15 Pro is noticeable.

The same processor (or nearly so)

.

Another interesting thing about the Air is that it mounts the more advanced A19 Pro chip, the same as the 17 Pro even though the Pro has a 6-core GPU as opposed to the Air's 5 cores. This means that the Air performs very well even with heavy use, the difference with the Pro at this point is really hard to grasp. Perhaps Apple simply wanted to connote the Pro as top-of-the-line hardware not having the same physical limitations as the Air.

The battery

.

The big question about this Air is the battery. Apple says it lasts as long as that of the 16 Pro. The 16 Pro I have used for a long time with very heavy usage and often didn't make it to the end of the day. In fact, I have always carried an external battery with me on trips and intense work days. It is no coincidence that Apple sells one designed specifically for the Air for 115 euros, which is not exactly cheap. A new iOS 26 feature comes to the rescue: adaptive battery mode, which adapts consumption to the way we use the phone.

However, this is something to consider: the Air is a very nice phone, because it has the best design, is comfortable, has a great processor and a perfect screen, but it is not ideal for a very intensive user. If, on the other hand, you come from previous generations of iPhones, say from 2-3 models ago onwards, you will probably be satisfied.

The 48 MP camera on the other hand works very well, admittedly the Pro now goes to 8X zoom and the difference can be felt. Instead, the Pro takes a new step forward, with video and photo quality about which there is little to say: it now has three 48 MP sensors, previously the tele was 12. Even the 17 now has both 48 cameras.

Perhaps even better is the front-facing camera, which in the entire iPhone 17 range increases to 18MP from 12MP. In addition, there is this new feature that switches between portrait and landscape view, also in automatic, to take better selfies and with more people and it works very well.

In conclusion

.

Bottom line: iPhone Air is an interesting phone, especially as a concept. For Apple it is probably the debut of a new category that we will see grow and improve over time. According to some rumours it could be the starter for the first foldable iPhone as early as next year, but in any case the engineering work done on component optimisation will have consequences for Apple's entire range of future smartphones.

iPhone 17 Pro confirms itself as a professional top of the range, the name already says it, the new zoom is an advancement, it doesn't get hot and the battery seems to last longer than the 16 Pro. If we want to be even more confident, with the 17 Pro Max the guarantee of making it to the end of the day is definitely greater.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti