The value of Italian defence is 16 billion euro. Crosetto: 'Asked for threat picture, I will inform all leaders'
A paper highlights that military investment in research and development often leads to scientific and technological breakthroughs that then find applications in the civil sector (dual - use). Defence Minister: EU defence funds? "Safe should be used'
by Andrea Carli
7' min read
Key points
7' min read
The topic of EU rearmament is highly topical. In a few days, on the occasion of the summit between the heads of state and government of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation scheduled to take place in The Hague on 24-25 June, NATO will ask the member states to raise the bar, and to allocate 3.5% of GDP per year for weapons, the remaining 1.5% for strategic investments in infrastructure, industry and security. According to NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, the Atlantic Alliance must "increase its air and missile defence capability by 400%" in response to the Russian threat. And Rutte himself will be received on Thursday 12 June in Rome by Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni. Each government is called upon to define its strategy.
In the conviction that while investing in the defence industry generates national income and employment, this type of investment today represents the main opportunity for Italy to advance in technological research and engage in the industrial innovation that is transforming the civil economy. This is somewhat the message of the paper 'Defence. the necessary industry', presented today, Monday 9 June, by the Louis Einaudi Foundation. Together with the biotechnological and pharmaceutical sectors and the information and communication technology sector, the industrial, aerospace and defence sectors, by their very nature, invest a great deal in scientific and technological research, and all this presupposes the achievement of very high standards of quality and reliability.
Defence Minister Guido Crosetto, among others, spoke at the presentation of the survey. Using European funds to invest in defence? "Safe should be used. The part of those investments, and the possibility of using them in a very simple way, should be exploited. So some yes,' he said. "I have asked the Chief of Defence Staff to give me a real picture of the threats and the current state of our defence: when I have it I will call and inform all the political leaders in the country, so that they cannot say 'I did not know'. From the next day, when each of them speaks, they will do so knowing the same things that I know,' he added.
"We have moved abruptly into the fold of the great powers, in which little importance is attached to the growth of peoples' welfare and much importance is attached to the capacity for power that a nation can express. Power capacity that can be military, technological or raw materials. And in such a world, Europe matters much less. Because Europe is not a model to follow, but risks being a rich old man to be plucked,' Crosetto noted.
"The complexity of defence in this period is having to compose a picture that goes from the highest technologies, because the race through artificial intelligence, through quantum computing has more and more difficult and more and more complex challenges, those in space, those on the seabed, wars fought by artificial intelligence drones or humanoid robots, things that seemed like science fiction are becoming more and more real, and on the other side in Ukraine we have the war fought by human beings in the trenches the same as in the First World War. We have a snapshot of reality in which everything is there: we have realised that it is as much about technology as it is about the quantity of production, as it is about dealing with threats that have low costs. You think,' he explained, 'that an American ship last week to repel an attack carried out by eighty Houthi drones costing a few thousand euro each fired 80 missiles that cost an average of two million euro each. Just think that Israel's first attack cost a billion to defend the country in those three hours. We need a very high level of technology and things that cost very little that we can use against things that cost very little. There is a very complex security and defence issue that has to be played out on many levels'.


