Reproductive medicine

One in 20 children is conceived through assisted reproduction, but income and the CAP restrict access

According to the Health Minister’s report to Parliament, 17,660 babies were born in 2024; however, the report also reveals that access to these techniques varies depending on a person’s initial circumstances

 (AdobeStock)

2' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

2' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

One in twenty children in Italia is born through medically assisted reproduction (MAR). According to the Health Minister’s report to Parliament, 17,660 children were born in 2024. This figure highlights the importance of reproductive medicine. However, the same report paints a picture of a country where access to these techniques still depends on income, place of residence and family composition.

Inequalities take their toll

A health issue thus becomes a matter of democracy and equality.

Loading...

The Constitution does not merely recognise abstract freedoms. Article 3 commits the Republic to removing the economic and social obstacles that prevent the full development of the individual, and Article 32 protects health as a fundamental right. It is not enough to know which services are available: what matters is who can actually access them.

Genetic diagnosis not covered by the Lea

Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis demonstrates this. It also enables couples who are carriers of serious genetic conditions to make informed reproductive choices. The Constitutional Court, in its judgement No. 96 of 2015, lifted the ban on access for these couples. Yet the service is not expressly included in the national Essential Levels of Care (LEA), and only a few regions provide it using their own resources. 74.2 per cent of tests are carried out in private facilities. The right is therefore recognised but not guaranteed to everyone.

‘For the wealthy’ heterologous treatment

The same applies to heterologous fertilisation. The ban was lifted in 2014 and the technique is included in the Essential Healthcare Services (LEA), but public provision remains uneven: 67.1 per cent of treatment cycles take place in the private sector and 38.1 per cent outside the patient’s region of residence. 99.6 per cent of the donated oocytes used come from abroad, and there is no uniform national coverage of the costs associated with gamete procurement.

This distance places a burden on people who cannot afford the travel and additional costs. And in reproductive medicine, time is of the essence: a delay can reduce the chances of success.

Added to these inequalities is one enshrined in Law 40: the exclusion of single women and female couples. In Judgment No. 69 of 2025, the Constitutional Court clarified that there are no constitutional obstacles to a legislative decision to extend access to single women. This does not claim an absolute right to have a child, but rather the freedom to shape one’s own life plan responsibly.

The ‘IVF for All’ proposal

Politicians talk about the falling birth rate and support for families, but allow bans and economic barriers to remain in place. The Government must ensure adequate essential healthcare services and accessible treatment throughout the country, and Parliament can debate the ‘Assisted Reproduction for All’ citizens’ initiative, backed by over 50,000 signatures, to lift the ban on women and female couples accessing medically assisted reproduction.

Rights do not exist solely in laws or court rulings, but in the material conditions that make it possible to exercise them. When a freedom depends on income or place of residence, it is equality that is called into question. A liberal democracy is also judged by its ability to prevent the opportunities offered by science from becoming privileges for the few.

* Lawyer and National Secretary of the Luca Coscioni Association

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti