Agro-industry

Trump-Milei agreement: Grana, Asiago and Gorgonzola made in the USA become protected

Coldiretti's complaint: agreement in conflict with the protections of the EU-Mercosur agreement. Assolatte: speed up implementation of rules

by Giorgio dell'Orefice

Da sinistra a destra, il presidente degli Stati Uniti Donald Trump e quello dell’Argentina Javier Milei

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

President Trump's right-wing overtake of Italian food products. Just a few days after the signing of the EU-Mercosur trade agreement (which can enter into force immediately pending the judgement of the EU Court of Justice requested by the European Parliament and which provides enhanced protection for 347 European PDOs and PGIs, 58 of which are Italian), President Trump has signed a trade agreement with Argentine President Javier Milei that provides protection for certain American food products that fully replicate the names of some Italian and European denominations of origin.

What the US-Argentine Understanding envisages

Under the US-Argentina agreement, Asiago, Fontina, Gorgonzola, Grana, Parmesan, Pecorino and Provolone made in the USA will be protected. Just as Camembert, Edam, Feta, Emmental and Gouda made in the USA will be protected. But that is not all. Generic product names such as burrata, mascarpone (which is growing rapidly on international markets driven by the success of tiramisu) produced in North America will also be protected. All this is in open contrast to the EU-Mercosur agreement, which instead aims to protect the same protected names of products made in Europe and Italia.

Loading...

In the short circuit even cold cuts

A real short-circuit that will also involve cured meats, since the Trump-Milei agreement also aims to protect the self-styled Bologna, Capicola/Capicollo, Chorizo, Mortadella, Pancetta, Prosciutto and Salami made in the USA, to the detriment of those produced in Italia.

Coldiretti: EU-Mercosur protections at risk

The complaint was raised by Coldiretti according to which "the US-Argentina agreement risks cancelling the protection granted by the Ue-Mercosur agreement to Italian and European excellence. How can we reconcile - Coldiretti asks again - the protection to Italian designations if one of the main signatories of the agreement (Argentina is one of the four countries of the Mercosur together with Brazil, Uruguay and Paraguay) opens up to a complete liberalisation of their imitations?".

All of this in favour of a country like the United States 'which,' Coldiretti continues, 'leads the ranking of the biggest counterfeiters, i.e. producers of fake Italian products to a value in excess of 40 billion'.

Origin: grave concern

"We consider the Agreement with Mercosur to be strategic,' commented the president of Origin Italia (the association that brings together the consortia for the protection of Italian PDO and PGI products), Cesare Baldrighi, 'because it broadens the prospects for our Geographical Indications in markets of great importance, strengthened by the significant presence of communities of Italian origin. On the other hand, the recent initiatives of the United States, aimed at liberalising the use of terms that they deem generic but which, in reality, correspond to protected PDO and PGI denominations, are of great concern. The approach adopted first with Cambodia and now with Argentina, with the intention of extending it to other areas of South America, is a clear attack on the Geographical Indications system. We have expressed our concerns to the Minister of Agriculture, Lollobrigida, who has assured us of her commitment to oppose a protectionist action that aims at weakening the founding principles of GIs'.

Assolatte: speed up entry into force of treaty with South American countries

"Even if it is perhaps premature,' commented Assolatte, 'to say that the US-Argentine agreement collides with the guarantees obtained from the EU-Mercosur agreement - the result of an enormous and long chisel work - we believe that what happened should be a stimulus for a rapid entry into force of the agreement and its ratification by our country. What happened is, in fact, an important wake-up call for everyone: it would be a real shame if, after so much commitment and so many efforts to obtain the protection of our most representative PDOs, loopholes were to open up that could make such protection merely fictitious. It is therefore necessary,' they conclude at Assolatte, 'to speed up the entry into force of the agreement and build a system that monitors its correct and full application.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti