The case

Venice Biennale: risk fund does not cover EU suspension – only €300,000 set aside

The 2025 budget refers to the ‘potential risk of the suspension or interruption of the disbursement of European grant instalments’

Biennale di Venezia, l'Ue revoca i fondi: stop al finanziamento da 2 milioni

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

Allowing Russia to reopen its pavilion for the first time since Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 could cost the Venice Biennale €2 million: this is the amount of funding that the European Union has decided to withdraw in response to Russia’s return to the 2026 edition.

The appeal

However, the game is not over yet. At least not for the foundation led by Pietrangelo Buttafuoco (appointed as president by the Meloni government in March 2023) who reiterated: ‘We will put forward our case in all the relevant forums’, noting that this is a decision that had long been announced and that, therefore, ‘it obliges us to take the next steps already made known’, namely an appeal.

Loading...

On the eve of a move that now seemed inevitable on the part of Brussels, the Venice Biennale had begun to consider bringing a case before the European Court: a decision resulting from the meeting of the board of directors held on 15 July at Ca’ Giustinian.

The ‘defunded’ project

The project, funded under the Creative Europe Programme (Crea), began in May 2022 and concluded in April 2025: it co-funded ‘industrial’ activities in the film sector, specifically those relating to Venice Production Bridge and Biennale College, with a total budget of 4.387 million euros, of which just under half (2 million) came from Brussels.

‘The essence and distinctive feature of the Venice Production Bridge,’ reads the EU factsheet, ‘lie in its focus on production and in providing producers with a wide range of services, projects and networking events, offering them the entire production chain. All these activities are designed to boost B2B exchanges between European and international professionals. The VPB currently involves over 2,500 professionals.”

The impact on the accounts

“These are ‘activities and sectors that have nothing to do with Russia’s participation in the Art Biennale’,” emphasised the Foundation, which gave assurances that the measure “has no significant impact on the budget, the financial statements or the planned and ongoing activities of the Venice Biennale, which remain unchanged”.

The high-risk fund

In anticipation of a decision that seemed a foregone conclusion, the Biennale had, ‘as a precautionary measure’, increased its provision for risks by 302,000 euros to cover, as stated in the latest financial statements (for the year 2025), “a potential risk of the suspension or interruption of the disbursement of instalments of European grants” in light of “the information received from the European Commission following the announcement of the Russian Federation’s participation” in the Art Biennale.

However, the provision set aside in the accounts, which covers just 15 per cent of the funding withdrawn by the European Commission’s European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA), will also serve to ‘protect’ the foundation from the impact on its financial statements of proceedings before the Veneto Regional Administrative Court ‘concerning the award of the tender for access control and crowd management services during the 82nd and 83rd Venice International Film Festival’.

Won cases

On the other hand, the latest approved financial statements also state that €510,000 was removed from the provision for future risks, ‘relating to the amount quantified and recognised in 2024 in respect of the risk of litigation arising from two tender procedures, namely for thethe award of the redevelopment works for the Central Pavilion at the Biennale Art Gardens and for the security service for the Art, Architecture and Cinema events and venues for the three-year period 2024–2026’. In both cases, the Foundation prevailed.

There is also a second, unusual legal dispute, brought ‘by a female member of the audience at the Venice International Film Festival who is claiming damages for not having been able to walk the festival’s red carpet’. It should be noted – as stated in the financial statements – that, following the end of the financial year, the first-instance judgement was received on 13 April 2026, ordering the total dismissal of the claimant’s claims and, indeed, acknowledges not only gross negligence but also wilful misconduct on the part of the opposing party in bringing the legal action. Consequently, the opposing party was ordered to reimburse legal costs and to pay a sum pursuant to Article 96(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure.”

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti