President Luca Dal Fabbro speaks

“Utilitalia: 19.5 billion a year in post-PNRR investment is needed”

The Federation’s chief executive has put forward a proposal for a sector-specific ‘basket bond’ to support medium- to long-term programmes

by Celestina Dominelli

Il presidente di Utilitalia, Luca Dal Fabbro

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

‘In recent years, the NRRP has been a key driver in reviving investment in local public services, mobilising a total of around 24 billion euros for the water, waste and energy sectors. This significant injection of resources has been successfully channelled by our member companies in a timely and effective manner.” Utilitalia’s president, Luca Dal Fabbro, gets straight to the point and, in this interview with *Il Sole 24 Ore*, highlights the efforts made by companies to accelerate the energy transition. He does so on the eve of the Federation’s general assembly, which will bring together companies, institutions and stakeholders in Rome today to discuss development prospects in the post-PNRR phase. “We have managed to transform public funds into ongoing projects aimed at reducing water losses, creating modern circular economy facilities and digitising electricity networks – a process that has only just begun and must continue over the coming years,” continues Dal Fabbro. “And this effort has been concentrated above all in Southern Italy, an area where the infrastructure gap has historically been more pronounced and where there was a greater need to step up the pace to ensure social and territorial equity.”

What is the estimated funding requirement following the PNRR? 

Loading...

According to the Federation’s analysis, the investment requirement amounts to around 19.5 billion euros a year – of which 6 billion is for the water sector, 2 billion for the waste sector and 11.5 billion for the energy sector. We face a range of challenges: these range from improving the efficiency of water networks to modernising waste management facilities. In the energy sector, meanwhile, the priority is the modernisation and resilience of distribution networks. This represents a huge volume of investment which clearly cannot be sustained solely by companies’ ordinary finances, nor can it be passed on in full to the tariffs paid by the public.

What are the possible measures for raising new funds?

In keeping with the approach that has always characterised Utilitalia, we intend to roll up our sleeves and continue to invest in our country’s future. For this reason, we have championed the proposal for a sector-specific basket bond as part of a major initiative in industrial policy and financial inclusion. This instrument is designed to pool the financing needs of multiple companies and support medium- to long-term investment programmes, including those of smaller operators. The aim is to build a financial platform capable of broadening utilities’ access to the capital markets, diversifying sources of funding beyond the banking sector alone, and ensuring more stable support for infrastructure investment.

Who are you planning to involve? Have you already started discussions with a view to putting these plans into practice? 

We have already initiated numerous discussions with banks, credit funds and other institutional investors, including the European Investment Bank (EIB). In particular, with regard to the role of institutional investors, it is important to provide investment guarantees that pool small and medium-sized entities within the basket bond, which would otherwise find it difficult to provide guarantees. In this sense, the sector-specific basket bond is not intended as a substitute for the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (PNRR), but as a potential standard tool to support the utilities’ new investment cycle over time.

When do you think they will be fully developed?

If we continue along the path we have been following recently, we could have the tools we are hoping for within 6–12 months.

There is also talk of using cohesion policy funds. How do you intend to make use of them?

These are among the public instruments that could support this type of operation, starting with resources from the Development and Cohesion Fund (FSC) to be allocated towards the establishment of a portfolio guarantee or cash collateral in favour of the SPV (special purpose vehicle) tasked with pooling the bond issues of the participating companies. Under this scheme, public funds would not be used as a direct contribution to individual transactions, but would serve to mitigate the risk of the operation, helping to improve the portfolio’s credit profile and encourage participation by institutional investors.If we continue along the path taken in recent months, we could have the desired instruments in place within 6–12 months.

There is also talk of using cohesion policy funds. How do you intend to make use of them?

These are among the public instruments that could support this type of operation, starting with resources from the Development and Cohesion Fund (FSC) to be allocated towards the establishment of a portfolio guarantee or cash collateral in favour of the SPV (special purpose vehicle) tasked with pooling the bond issues of the participating companies. Under this scheme, public funds would not be used as a direct contribution to individual transactions, but would serve to mitigate the risk of the operation, helping to improve the portfolio’s credit profile and encourage participation by institutional investors.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti