Medical Devices

Wheelchairs and walkers: 8 out of 10 patients in difficulty and 63% pay out of pocket

Long delays and bureaucracy among the main problems while 70.6% of professionals report a negative impact of tenders on the quality of aids

by Ernesto Diffidenti

 (Adobe Stock)

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

More than 8 out of 10 patients (84.8%) experience difficulties in obtaining aids and prostheses through the National Health Service, while 63% have incurred personal expenses to obtain or use them. This was revealed by two surveys conducted by the Confindustria Medical Devices Research Centre and promoted by Aito (Italian Association of Occupational Therapy) in collaboration with 13 other industry associations on patients/caregivers and prosthetic care professionals, which highlight widespread critical issues, but also a positive finding: 84.8% of patients say they are satisfied with the aid they received. The survey is presented at Expo Sanità in Bologna. For the president of the Aids Association of Confindustria Dispositivi Medici, Elena Menichini, the data demonstrate "the need to intervene on the Nomenclator, review the aids put out to tender, and ensure uniformity throughout the territory by simplifying processes".

The difficulties reported by patients

Among the main difficulties reported by patients in obtaining an assistive device are long waiting times (56.5%), complex bureaucratic procedures (51.1%), while 65.2% state that they feel uninformed about the possible solutions available.Despite the fact that almost half (47.8%) carry out a prior assessment with health professionals, in 54.4% of cases the device has to be modified once received. In addition, 70.6% of patients experienced that useful accessories or adaptations were not covered by the National Health Service at least once.

Loading...

The aids considered mainly include preventive and therapeutic devices (such as anti-decubitus pillows and ventilators), orthoses and prostheses, mobility aids (wheelchairs, walkers), static aids and personal care and hygiene aids.

The point of view of health professionals

Health professionals confirm the structural difficulties of the system. 77.5% believe that the current Nomenclator (DPCM LEA 2017) only partially allows for real customisation of aids, while 93% report inconsistencies between technical descriptions and the devices actually available. Among the main issues related to the Nomenclator: inadequate tariffs (61.8%), absence of devices or components used today (60.3%), technical errors or ambiguities (41.9%) and presence of obsolete aids (31.8%).

The tendering procedures for "near-made-to-measure" aids represent a further critical issue: 78.7% of professionals report operational or clinical problems, with effects on the reduction of choice (49.8%) and quality of available products (49.4%), time and complexity of procedures (37.5%). Almost 70% believe that tenders have had a negative impact on the quality of the aids provided, while the use of economic integration at the expense of the patient represents an obstacle to the appropriateness of supply.

Need to review the system

Priority reforms indicated by professionals include: overcoming tenders for complex aids (32.6%), ensuring national uniformity in pathways (32.2%) and introducing mandatory multidisciplinary assessment for the most complex cases (30%). 77.9% favoured the introduction of a new list dedicated to complex disability aids that cannot be managed by tender.

"Patients struggle to follow a path and encounter significant obstacles," Menichini further comments, "often forced to bear direct costs, and professionals report regulatory and organisational limits that prevent full appropriateness and customisation of solutions, even though these are present in the market". These data, according to the president of Confindustria Dispositivi Medici, "clearly show that the prosthetic assistance system needs a thorough overhaul, in order to truly respond to people's needs and improve the efficiency of the system because there are hidden costs, process costs, caused by bureaucracy and inertia in updating a Nomenclator, which fails to keep pace with people's needs and technologies".

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti