Chocolate

Why is the Turin Giandujotto not yet PGI? A story of (dis)agreements and appeals that began in 2017

Recognition seemed just a step away and instead came an appeal to the TAR by Lindt: just the last stage (perhaps) of a path that proved long, difficult and bumpy to reach a shared specification to be filed in Brussels

by Manuela Soressi

Il giandujotto, tradizionale cioccolatino piemontese alle nocciole Luigi Bertello Photo - stock.adobe.com

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

It was born under a lucky star and has had a prosperous, century-long existence. At least until 2017, when for the Giandujotto di Torino the process for European recognition of the Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) began. A path that proved to be long, difficult and bumpy due to the difficulty in agreeing on the specifications to be filed in Brussels. There are two opposing positions: on the one hand, the approximately 40 Piedmontese companies and artisans united in the Comitato Giandujotto di Torino, chaired by Guido Castagna, and on the other the Swiss company Lindt & Sprüngli, owner of the Caffarel brand.

That is to say the company where, in 1852, Paul Caffarel invented this chocolate, brilliantly and tastefully solving the scarcity of cocoa dictated by the drastic reductions imposed by the royal government on imports of 'luxury' goods. He dared to replace it in part with toasted Piedmontese round hazelnuts reduced to a paste: a successful combination. Once the recipe had been perfected, Caffarel had two more intuitions: he gave a precise name to this delicacy, christening it first 'Givu' and then 'Gianduia' in honour of the characteristic Piedmontese mask, and he cut it into small pieces, which were then wrapped in foil. Thus was born the first wrapped chocolate in history. 

Loading...

Since then, the success of Giandujotto has not stopped and nowadays hundreds of companies produce it, each according to their own recipe. To protect the traditional one, identifying 'the authentic giandujotto of Turin', the process for Igp recognition was therefore started, which should have been concluded quickly and instead, amidst various misadventures, has been going on for almost a decade.

The reason for the dispute was the Giandujotto 'recipe': the Committee's producers (such as Domori, Venchi, Gobino, Pastiglie Leone and Guido Castagna) defended the traditional recipe, which includes IGP Piedmont Hazelnuts (30 to 45%), sugar (20 to 45%) and cocoa (at least 25%) as main ingredients. Instead Lindt would have liked to include milk among the ingredients and change the amount of hazelnuts.

Two opposing positions and a stalemate that has lengthened the time for approval of the PGI. After the publication of the application for registration in the Official Journal on 9 May 2025, different objections arrived at the Ministry of Agriculture, Food Sovereignty and Forestry, which were then evaluated and rejected. Finally, on 23 March 2026, Masaf ordered the transmission of the specifications to the European Commission for recognition of the PGI, which should have arrived within the year.

On 4 June, however, Lindt decided to oppose the measure with which Masaf approved the PGI specification and sent it to Brussels. It did so by submitting to the Tar del Lazio an appeal in which it contested not the recipe but the supposability of the PGI with its own registered trademark 'Gianduia 1865 - L'autentico Gianduiotto di Torino' under which it signs the products made in the historical factory of Luserna San Giovanni. A decision that came as a surprise, given that the long confrontation between companies had "saved" this and other names already in use in some companies (such as Baratti & Milano) by including in the specifications the concession to continue using them for transitional periods of up to 15 years, although without bearing the PGI.

Lindt's move could reopen the PGI game. The promoters' fear is that the EU Commission, appealing to Article 16 of EU Regulation 2024/1143, will decide to suspend examination of the registration application while waiting for the Lazio Regional Administrative Court to rule on the legitimacy of the ministerial measure.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti