Brenner border closures: EU Court of Justice Advocate General rules in Italia’s favour: ‘Unlawful bans’
According to the Advocate General, the night-time, sector-specific and winter driving bans imposed by Austria along the Alpine motorway are contrary to EU law
Key points
In the never-ending tug-of-war between Italia and Austria over bans and restrictions on the movement of HGVs (heavy goods vehicles) along the Brenner Alpine Corridor, the government in Rome has scored a point in its favour that could prove decisive.
Rome and Vienna are currently embroiled in a legal dispute before the European Court of Justice, where Italy has lodged an appeal against the policy of unilateral blockades imposed by Tyrol and endorsed by Vienna.
According to Italia, the Austrian restrictions run counter to the founding principle of the European Union – namely, the free movement of goods and people – and seriously harm the interests of the Italian economy.
“The night-time, sector-specific and winter driving bans imposed by Austria on heavy goods vehicles on the A12 Inn Valley and A13 Brenner motorways are contrary to EU law.” This is the Opinion of the Advocate General of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Manuel Campos Sánchez-Bordona, proposing that the action for failure to fulfil obligations brought against Italia be upheld on these points.
The lawyer, however, considers the system for regulating access to the A12 (a quota system, i.e. a cap of 300 vehicles per hour at the border crossings between Germany and Austria) to be lawful, as Rome has not demonstrated that it constitutes a quantitative restriction.


