Business Agility, strategic competence to govern uncertainty
In an environment of increasing instability, companies must evolve from agile teams to organisations capable of adapting quickly and consistently
by Domenico Tricamo*
Uncertainty is no longer an exception to be reckoned with: it has become a structural variable of the competitive environment. Geopolitical instability, technological acceleration, chaotic changes in consumption and regulatory pressure out of sync with market cycles are reshaping the boundaries of every sector. In this scenario, competitive advantage no longer comes from the ability to predict, but from the ability to adapt quickly and consistently. Being antifragile - to use Nassim Nicholas Taleb's concept - is no longer a goal of excellence, but a requirement for survival.
It is in this context that Business Agility emerges as a strategic competence in professional organisations. Its roots lie in the four principles of the Manifesto for Agile Software Development, the 2001 revolution that celebrates its 25th anniversary this year. An anniversary that coincides with a collective question: are those principles, born in the world of software development, still sufficient to govern the complexity of the entire enterprise? The most authoritative answer comes from the Project Management Institute and the Agile Alliance, which responded with the Manifesto for Enterprise Agility, published in February 2026: a framework that explicitly shifts the focus from team agility to that of the entire organisation, including leadership, governance and culture.
Business Agility, however, is not a methodology. It is a systemic capability involving strategy, operating model and organisational culture, and cannot be reduced to a single all-encompassing framework. In operational terms, it can be articulated along three dimensions: strategic (dynamic reallocation of resources), organisational (value-oriented multidisciplinary teams) and cultural (widespread leadership and accountability).
Empirical evidence confirms the relevance of the topic. According to McKinsey & Company, agile organisations - understood as those that combine speed and stability - are 70% likely to rank in the top quartile for organisational health, which is itself a robust predictor of financial performance. PMI's data on a sample of more than 700 C-suite executives globally offers a further measure of what is at stake: 93 per cent of top executives say they need to rethink their operating model at least every five years, with nearly two-thirds doing so every two years or faster. Yet while business agility is considered critical in 85% of cases, only 35% say they have implemented it substantially. This is the gap that defines the real challenge.
Organisation determines value
To understand why this gap is so persistent, it is necessary to start with a fundamental observation. A decision can arise from an individual or a small group, completely independent of the organisation. But it is the organisation that determines its value. Decisions do not produce results the moment they are formulated, but when they are effectively pursued. Organisational reception capacity - the speed and quality with which an organisation translates a decision into action - is the real bottleneck. Even excellent decisions, even those on which the future of the company depends, are lost in structures that are not built to receive them. The challenge of Business Agility is precisely here: in making organisations not only adaptive, but highly receptive to change.


