Media

Cinema and audiovisual, adjustments to the tax credit reform coming soon

The Mic and Mef decree amending the regulations of the new tax credit is ready. The measure removes the constraints on distribution companies to obtain the benefit

by Andrea Biondi

 ANSA/TINO ROMANO

3' min read

3' min read

The intervention is substantial. It is a sign that the Ministry of Culture has decided to get its hands heavily on the much-discussed tax credit reform, especially to mitigate certain rigidities present in the original decree in order to also mitigate effects that could be distorting or excessively restrictive provisions. According to what Il Sole 24 Ore was able to verify, a corrective decree is on its way with which the Ministry of Culture, in collaboration with the Ministry of the Economy, intends to make changes to Interministerial Decree No. 225 of 10 July 2024, which regulates the tax credit for film and audiovisual productions. The objective? To make the tax incentive system more inclusive and adapted to the needs of the market.

This intervention comes at a particular time, with the tax credit reform finally becoming operative after a year and a half of discussions, but also alarms - such as the one launched by a group of 15 associations of workers in the sector, promoters of the 'SOS Cinema' appeal - on the situation of the sector and the sword of Damocles of the appeal by some companies against the reform, with the TAR (Regional Administrative Tribunal) setting the redde rationem in court at the beginning of March.

Loading...

More flexibility

.

Reading the introductory report shows how the reformed decree, the result of months of work carried out by the Mic also with some associations, aims to address three priorities: simplifying access to tax credits, rebalancing contractual relations between producers and distributors, and mitigating the distorting effects of previous regulations. The changes, already anticipated by some implementing decrees, are therefore now ready to be formalised in an organic and updated text.

Prominent among the changes introduced is the removal of the requirement for an agreement with a 'leading film distribution company'. This clause had been criticised by those who feared it would create insurmountable barriers for many independent producers. It was also stipulated that the distribution agreement must be submitted and verified in the final application.

At the same time, the circulation requirements are eased: for works with a budget of up to EUR 3.5 million, a minimum of 240 screenings, spread over a number of sales in accordance with current regulations, will be sufficient. This apparently technical change represents a breath of fresh air for those producing niche works or those with limited resources. The definition of the financing requirements is also simplified: for several categories of works, the need to prove that part of the resources come from private sources is eliminated, which was at least 40% of the cost (30% for documentaries and 50% in the case of works for TV).

Reinvestment and Sanctions

.

At the heart of the reform is the obligation to reinvest at least part of the tax credit. Producers will have five years to use the funds in new audiovisual projects or to purchase goods functional to the production. The definition of the portion of the tax credit to be reinvested, the technical modalities and the verification procedures related to the fulfilment of the reinvestment obligation are left to a decree of the Director General of the Mic. Those who fail to comply with this obligation risk big time: exclusion from tax benefits for a period of five years is a sanction that should leave no room for non-compliance.

The rights node

.

Another highlight of the reform is the rebalancing of contractual relations between independent producers and broadcasters or distribution platforms. The treatment for producers working with Mediaset and Rai or, on the other hand, with the platforms has been equalised. Originally there was some extra advantage for those working with the TVs. Now it has been foreseen that the original independent producer, in the case of priority exploitation of the free TV right, fully and unconditionally retains the pay TV and video-on-demand rights with the possibilitỳ of ceding the rights of the free VOD or with advertising (Avod), as long as not exclusive, to the same audiovisual media service provider. In the event of a priority exploitation of the pay TV right, of the VOD right of the work, the producer fully and unconditionally retains the free TV rights and related catch-up rights, with the provision of a maximum holdback increased from 12 to 18 months. Finally, it has been provided that the producer may transfer the free TV right in its possession to the same audiovisual media service provider only after 6 months from the first broadcasting of the work.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti