Alternatives to Hormuz and the Middle East

Cronos, Aphrodite and Leviathan. The gas fields that supply the EU and bolster Cairo’s position

Europe and companies across the Old Continent are strengthening and integrating the energy hub in the eastern Mediterranean: comprising Greece, Cyprus, Israel and Egypt. However, it is al-Sisi’s country that plays the key role in the conversion to LNG

by Paolo Di Carlo

Aggiungi Il Sole 24 Ore
ai preferiti su Google
Nikos Christodoulidis, presidente della Repubblica di Cipro, durante un vertice dei capi di Stato e di governo dell'Unione europea  (Malin Wunderlich/dpa via Reuters Connect)

7' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

7' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

If there is one lesson that Europe has had to learn the hard way, it is the importance of diversifying its energy supplies. The Old Continent is dependent on foreign countries for its gas and oil supplies. In itself, this might not be a problem; however, when serious instability or crises arise, the effects can be devastating. We got our first taste of this with the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian war: imports from Moscow ceased and energy bills soared. We sought out other markets, and the damage was limited. Then came the conflict between the United States and Iran, which led to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important chokepoints for maritime traffic and the transit of gas and oil. And now the crisis has spread to the Strait of Bab el-Mandeb, the gateway to the Red Sea, and therefore to the Mediterranean. Are there alternatives? There are, but the issue is more complex than it seems.

SCOPERTA GIACIMENTO AL LARGO DI CIPRO

Loading...

 

Loading...

Europe is building a new energy architecture in the eastern Mediterranean, which has one clear advantage and one significant limitation: on the one hand, it can reduce exposure to major maritime bottlenecks in the Persian Gulf and the Red Sea; on the other, it does not yet provide European governments with integrated control over the gas supply chain. As explained by Gianclaudio Torlizzi, a commodities expert, founder and director of T-Commodity and adviser to the Ministry of Defence, ‘on 28 July, Eni and the French company TotalEnergies took the final investment decision on the Cypriot Cronos field, in Block 6 (50 per cent each), containing over 3 Tcf (equivalent to 85 billion cubic metres) of gas and featuring four subsea wells, with a plateau production rate of approximately 500 million cubic feet per day (5.2 billion cubic metres per annum)’. “The gas,” explains Torlizzi, “will be transported via a pipeline to the Egyptian offshore facilities at Zohr, some 105 kilometres away, before proceeding to Damietta for liquefaction. The Egyptian option costs around $2 billion, half the cost of developing other fields in Cypriot waters. This will result in approximately 3.8 billion cubic metres per year of LNG, marketed separately by the two partners, with first production expected in 2028.”

This results in Cairo playing a key role. There is a sort of structural dependence on the country led by Abdel Fattah al-Sisi at the most critical point in the chain: the conversion of gas into exportable LNG.

To understand the significance of this operation, we need to start with a simple fact. Discovering gas is merely the first step. For an offshore field to become a source of supply for a country or a market, it must necessarily be connected to a network, refined, transported and, only at the very end, sold. It is precisely this stage that explains the choice of Cyprus. The island possesses the field and therefore the resource, but lacks a large-scale industrial liquefaction infrastructure. Egypt, by contrast, already has the necessary facilities. For Cronos, the solution identified by Eni and TotalEnergies therefore consists of combining the two existing segments: extraction in Cyprus and conversion to LNG in Egypt. The project thus avoids the need to build new liquefaction infrastructure on the island and allows existing facilities to be utilised. Cronos is the first milestone in this story. From Cyprus, the gas will be transported to Egypt via the pipeline linked to Zohr, liquefied at Damietta and from there loaded onto ships. A question may arise: why liquefy the gas extracted in Cyprus in Egypt rather than channelling it immediately through a pipeline to Europe? This is, in fact, the crux of the matter, as a pipeline restricts the product to a single route – whether by land or sea. But a LNG tanker, on the other hand, can be routed to different markets depending on contracts, prices and demand.

The real crux of the matter is Egypt

A key part of the supply chain is located in Egypt and relates to liquefaction capacity. The country has two large plants, one in Damietta and one in Idku (between Alexandria and Rosetta). The former has a capacity of around 5 million tonnes per annum, whilst the latter adds a further 7.2 million tonnes via two liquefaction trains. On paper, the Egyptian system can therefore process around 12.2 million tonnes of liquefied natural gas per year. Nevertheless, the plants’ capacity and the actual quantity of gas available are not one and the same. In recent years, Egypt has had to contend with high domestic demand and insufficient domestic production to meet it. In 2025, Egypt’s LNG imports reached around 1.2 billion cubic feet per day, compared with around 300 million in 2024. In June 2026, the country also had four floating storage and regasification units, with a total capacity of around 2.7 billion cubic feet per day. And here lies the first paradox: Cairo possesses the facilities to export LNG, yet at certain times it must import LNG to supply its own market. For this reason, the mere arrival of new gas from Cyprus – or from Israel – does not mean that all of that gas will be available for export. Some of it may have to be absorbed by Egyptian demand.

The supply chain would rest on a delicate balance. The more production from the eastern Mediterranean fields increases, the greater the likelihood that Damietta and Idku will be used on a permanent basis for exports. Conversely, if domestic demand in Egypt were to continue growing faster than supply, the liquefaction plants would risk remaining underutilised. This is why Cronos must be viewed within a broader context. The Cypriot field is the first in a series of new offshore production projects that could supply the Egyptian system. Off the coast of Cyprus lies Aphrodite, another field containing an estimated 5.6 trillion cubic feet of gas in place. The development plan envisages a floating platform with a maximum capacity of around 800 million cubic feet per day and four initial wells. Even more significant is the situation regarding Leviathan, in Israel. The field’s partners have secured authorisation for approximately 130 billion cubic metres of additional exports to Egypt and, in January 2026, approved a $2.36 billion investment to expand production. The stated aim is to bring annual capacity to 21 billion cubic metres from 2029. Cronos, Aphrodite and Leviathan can therefore be seen as pieces of the same jigsaw. None of the three projects, taken individually, would be sufficient to build a major regional hub. Together, however, they can supply Egyptian plants with sufficient quantities to ensure more regular liquefaction operations. This is the necessary condition for Damietta and Idku to transition from intermittently used infrastructure to a stable platform for the international LNG trade.

UN NUOVO HUB DI ENERGIA E TRASPORTI PER LA GRECIA

Loading...

The role of Greece

This is where Greece comes into the picture. Its role within the system differs from that of Egypt. The Alexandroupoli terminal in Thrace, which commenced commercial operations in October 2024, has a sustainable regasification capacity of approximately 5.5 billion cubic metres per year. Further north, the Greece-Bulgaria Interconnector currently has a capacity of around 3 billion cubic metres per year, with the potential to reach 5 billion. From here, the gas can continue on to Bulgaria, Romania, Moldova and Ukraine via the Vertical Corridor. Athens’ role is therefore to provide a southern gateway to the South-Eastern European gas system. This does not, of course, mean that every shipment produced at Damietta must necessarily reach Alexandroupoli. LNG is sold on the market and can be routed to various terminals. However, the presence of Greek and Balkan infrastructure increases the number of possible destinations and makes the regional distribution system more comprehensive.

The challenge for the coming years

Il Cane a sei zampe holds a 50 per cent stake in Cronos, is the field operator, holds a 50 per cent stake in SEGAS, the company that manages Damietta, and will market approximately 1.4 million tonnes per annum of LNG attributable to its share of production. It is therefore present both at the source of the supply chain – the Cypriot offshore field – and at its most critical industrial stage: liquefaction in Egypt. This does not, however, mean that Italia can unilaterally decide where the gas will end up. The field falls under Cypriot sovereignty, the Egyptian facilities fall under Egyptian sovereignty, and the LNG marketed by Eni and TotalEnergies will form part of their respective sales portfolios. For TotalEnergies, the logic is similar, albeit with a different degree of integration on the Egyptian side. As Torlizzi points out, ‘the entire system will come into operation from 2028 onwards, i.e. after the energy crisis Europe is currently facing, and not during it. Europe will have to face the winter of 2026/2027 with the storage levels it currently has.’ Not to mention that the first gas deliveries in 2028 could instead coincide with Qatar returning to full capacity and with a surge in new US liquefaction capacity – in other words, with a potentially oversupplied market and prices well below current levels. The issue is a delicate one: without giving the slightest consideration to Turkish interference in the region and the long-standing problem of Northern Cyprus, Nicosia controls the territory and the offshore concessions; Eni and TotalEnergies control Cronos from an industrial perspective; Egypt controls the processing and liquefaction plants; the companies market the LNG; ships transport it and European terminals regasify it. From that point, the gas enters the continental networks and can be transferred to other countries. The outcome will only be decided after 2028, and that part of the world is merely one square on a wider chessboard where the players contest games whose outcomes are often unpredictable.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti