Cronos, Aphrodite and Leviathan. The gas fields that supply the EU and bolster Cairo’s position
Europe and companies across the Old Continent are strengthening and integrating the energy hub in the eastern Mediterranean: comprising Greece, Cyprus, Israel and Egypt. However, it is al-Sisi’s country that plays the key role in the conversion to LNG
by Paolo Di Carlo
ai preferiti su Google
If there is one lesson that Europe has had to learn the hard way, it is the importance of diversifying its energy supplies. The Old Continent is dependent on foreign countries for its gas and oil supplies. In itself, this might not be a problem; however, when serious instability or crises arise, the effects can be devastating. We got our first taste of this with the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian war: imports from Moscow ceased and energy bills soared. We sought out other markets, and the damage was limited. Then came the conflict between the United States and Iran, which led to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important chokepoints for maritime traffic and the transit of gas and oil. And now the crisis has spread to the Strait of Bab el-Mandeb, the gateway to the Red Sea, and therefore to the Mediterranean. Are there alternatives? There are, but the issue is more complex than it seems.
Europe is building a new energy architecture in the eastern Mediterranean, which has one clear advantage and one significant limitation: on the one hand, it can reduce exposure to major maritime bottlenecks in the Persian Gulf and the Red Sea; on the other, it does not yet provide European governments with integrated control over the gas supply chain. As explained by Gianclaudio Torlizzi, a commodities expert, founder and director of T-Commodity and adviser to the Ministry of Defence, ‘on 28 July, Eni and the French company TotalEnergies took the final investment decision on the Cypriot Cronos field, in Block 6 (50 per cent each), containing over 3 Tcf (equivalent to 85 billion cubic metres) of gas and featuring four subsea wells, with a plateau production rate of approximately 500 million cubic feet per day (5.2 billion cubic metres per annum)’. “The gas,” explains Torlizzi, “will be transported via a pipeline to the Egyptian offshore facilities at Zohr, some 105 kilometres away, before proceeding to Damietta for liquefaction. The Egyptian option costs around $2 billion, half the cost of developing other fields in Cypriot waters. This will result in approximately 3.8 billion cubic metres per year of LNG, marketed separately by the two partners, with first production expected in 2028.”
This results in Cairo playing a key role. There is a sort of structural dependence on the country led by Abdel Fattah al-Sisi at the most critical point in the chain: the conversion of gas into exportable LNG.
To understand the significance of this operation, we need to start with a simple fact. Discovering gas is merely the first step. For an offshore field to become a source of supply for a country or a market, it must necessarily be connected to a network, refined, transported and, only at the very end, sold. It is precisely this stage that explains the choice of Cyprus. The island possesses the field and therefore the resource, but lacks a large-scale industrial liquefaction infrastructure. Egypt, by contrast, already has the necessary facilities. For Cronos, the solution identified by Eni and TotalEnergies therefore consists of combining the two existing segments: extraction in Cyprus and conversion to LNG in Egypt. The project thus avoids the need to build new liquefaction infrastructure on the island and allows existing facilities to be utilised. Cronos is the first milestone in this story. From Cyprus, the gas will be transported to Egypt via the pipeline linked to Zohr, liquefied at Damietta and from there loaded onto ships. A question may arise: why liquefy the gas extracted in Cyprus in Egypt rather than channelling it immediately through a pipeline to Europe? This is, in fact, the crux of the matter, as a pipeline restricts the product to a single route – whether by land or sea. But a LNG tanker, on the other hand, can be routed to different markets depending on contracts, prices and demand.
