Driving requirements

Drugs, even occasional consumption can prevent the issue of a driving licence

Council of State confirms 'no' to licence renewal for a driver with traces of cocaine below the Expert Guidelines threshold

by Silvio Scotti

2' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

2' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

While the many problems that were opened almost a year ago by the restriction of the Highway Code on the use of "drugs" (narcotic and psychotropic substances) by vehicle drivers are still unresolved, the Council of State recalls that the previous rules, inspired by the European driving licence directives, also require one to abstain from the use of these substances altogether and not only to drive only if one is not in an altered state. The only substantial difference between the previous situation and the one in force since 14 December last year (when the law

The guiding principle, valid both before and now, is that the driving licence is not a real right for everyone: even though it is widespread, it is still an authorisation entitling one to a dangerous activity such as driving a vehicle on public roads. And, as such, it requires a special suitability.

Loading...

The case

This is the principle underpinning the recent judgment of the Council of State of 17 September 2025, no. 7345, in which the court upheld the judgment of the Veneto Regional Administrative Court 1996/2024. The case concerned a driver who, after driving in a state of drunkenness, had his driving licence reviewed, with several checks by the competent local medical commission (MCL), which had always concluded that he was fit to drive. Until, in 2019, the MCL had found, with specific analyses, the presence of cocaine.

After being proved wrong by the Regional Administrative Court, he appealed to the Council of State, but did not succeed in overturning the outcome of the dispute.

The case is of extreme interest: it is possible to derive a guideline on the subject of confirmation and revocation of driving licences, in an extremely topical area, also in view of the legal and judicial events concerning the use of narcotic substances.

The Council of State emphasised some key principles.

Limited competence of judges

Firstly, the judges recalled that the judgement of the medical commissions is immune from assessment by the administrative judge, except in cases of unreasonableness.

EU standards prevail over national guidelines

Turning to the merits of the matter, the defence had argued that the quantities detected by the tests were below the cut-off thresholds laid down by the 'Guidelines for facilities equipped with laboratories for the investigation of substances of abuse for toxicological-forensic and medico-legal purposes on biological samples taken from living persons'. Despite this strong defence argument, the judges held that the Medical Committee's decision prevailed, as the values indicated in the guidelines do not have b>binding value, also by virtue of a regulation on the subject that leaves very little room for manoeuvre.

In fact, Legislative Decree No. 59 of 18 April 2011 ('Implementation of Directives 2006/126/EC and 2009/113/EC on driving licences') prohibits the issuance and renewal of licences for those who consume narcotic or psychotropic substances, without any reference to the quantity or habituality of the consumption.

Accordingly, the literal statement of the Council of State: 'Even occasional use of drugs is incompatible with fitness to drive'. The statement reflects a precise application of both national and European directives on the attainment and possession of a driving licence, imposing a global reflection also on the occasional use of drugs.

Copyright reserved ©

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti