Fighting obesity, new drugs now look beyond the scales
Studies presented at Echo 2026 in Istanbul show that the topic is no longer just losing weight: the focus shifts to maintenance and the effects of therapies on related diseases
It is no longer the weight loss that is the news. It is what happens next. The trajectory of anti-obesity drugs is changing rapidly, and the European Congress on Obesity (Eco26) in Istanbul made clear a phase shift: from results on weight loss to chronic management of the disease and its complications. Against this backdrop, the scientific competition between Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk is increasingly shifting to weight maintenance and the systemic effects of treatments.
The two pivotal papers presented at the congress, published in "The Lancet" and "Nature Medicine", address the same problem from complementary perspectives: what happens when therapy is continued, modified or interrupted.
In the Surmount-Maintain trial, published in The Lancet, patients treated with tirzepatide who continued treatment maintained almost all of the weight loss achieved in the initial phase, while discontinuation resulted in significant recovery. Participants who continued therapy at the maximum tolerated dose retained 96.5 per cent of the weight lost, while those who switched to placebo regained an average of around 13 kilos in one year. Reducing the dosage to 5 mg also proved more effective than stopping treatment completely. "Discontinuing an effective therapy in obesity means losing the clinical benefit gained," explained Deborah Horn of McGovern Medical School in Houston. "It is confirmation that obesity should be treated as a chronic disease.
The second study, Attain-Maintain published in 'Nature Medicine', evaluated the switch to the oral orforglipron developed by Eli Lilly. The data indicate that maintenance of weight loss remains largely possible even after switching formulations: patients on semaglutide retained around 79% of the weight lost, while those initially treated with tirzepatide retained around 75%. "For some patients, a slight weight regain may be clinically acceptable if oral therapy improves adherence over the long term," noted Louis Aronne of Weill Cornell Medicine in New York.
The issue of therapeutic persistence is also not secondary in organisational and economic terms. A daily tablet, without the need for injections or a cold chain, could reduce logistical costs, simplify distribution and limit treatment drop-outs. And it is precisely on therapeutic continuity that the next phase of the Glp-1 game will be played.


