Poggi murder, former prosecutor Venditti investigated in Brescia for corruption in Sempio case. 70-day extension for evidentiary accident
Former prosecutor Mario Venditti is under investigation for corruption in the 2007 Garlasco murder investigation. Searches also involved the family of a suspect. For the pems, the investigation at the time presented anomalies. The magistrate was allegedly bribed to exonerate Andrea Sempio
3' min read
3' min read
The gip of Pavia Daniela Garlaschelli has granted an extension of 70 days for the evidentiary investigation ordered in the new investigation into the Garlasco murder. The judge's own experts, geneticist Denise Albani and dactyloscopic expert Domenico Marchigiani, had asked for more time for the investigation. The decision comes at the end of this morning's hearing on 26 September, and the parties have been reconvened for 18 December.
Meanwhile, there is a breakthrough in the investigation into the murder of Chiara Poggi in Garlasco (Pavia) on 13 August 2007. The house searches began early in the morning and the former deputy prosecutor of Pavia, Mario Venditti, was entered by the Brescia Public Prosecutor's Office in the register of suspects for corruption in judicial acts in the Garlasco investigation.
According to prosecutor Claudia Moregola and chief prosecutor Francesco Prete, the magistrate was allegedly bribed to exonerate Andrea Sempio. Of this morning's searches (nine people were targeted by the measure), some involved the homes of Venditti, who twice filed Sempio. Other searches concerned the homes of Sempio's parents and uncles. The former prosecutor, as reconstructed by Ansa, was allegedly 'offered or in any case hypothesised the payment of a sum of money'.
According to the Public Prosecutor's Office of Brescia, 'the investigations conducted in 2017 against Andrea Sempio were characterised by a number of anomalies, including the omission by the public prosecutor in charge of the investigation of the transmission of some relevant passages of the environmental interceptions'.
"Accusatory hypothesis so serious..."
."The accusation is so serious that I believe it should not be commented on by a mere lawyer. The magistrates will prove the validity of these investigations, but the gravity of the contested facts is unprecedented'. Thus the lawyer Antonio De Rensis, defender of Alberto Stasi, on the new investigation into the Garlasco case involving former prosecutor Mario Venditti. "The investigation that brought Stasi to prison was riddled with errors and horrors, like erasing an alibi. Today's Pavia investigation and that of Brescia are studded with in-depth investigations. Here one adds, not takes away. And when you add you are usually less wrong'.

