Here's why too many wine-related events are only bad for wine
Most festivals (not the biggest fairs) have no return for the producer, who runs the risk of 'compulsory attendance', but at best only for the organiser
3' min read
3' min read
In recent years, the number of events created to promote wine has increased. It is probably time to do some serious thinking about the costs and effectiveness of investments by companies for all large events dedicated to the sector.
The numerous festivals that revolve around the world of wine create a continuous overlap of appointments and - together with the risk of cannibalising the presence of the public - generate an overexposure of the product that defeats the purpose for which they were planned.
Companies are finding it increasingly difficult to keep up with the constant requests to participate; the real risk is that events are 'attendance obligations' for companies without an adequate correspondence of correct and effective communication of the wine they want to make known.
I therefore question the effectiveness from the point of view of communication and on consumption, which - data in hand - is falling and the news is not to be taken lightly.
Consumers are turning away from wine for a number of reasons, among which I would focus on price, the recent expanding health trends that are increasingly pointing in an 'alchol-free' direction, especially among the younger generations, and - last but not least - the fact that wine is communicated in too elitist a way, for the use and consumption of a restricted circle of users.

